Participatory Policy Making in Practice: Simulating Boundary Work in Water Governance

Author(s):  
Nicolas Gailliard ◽  
Olivier Barreteau ◽  
Audrey Richard-Ferroudji
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isatis M. Cintron-Rodriguez ◽  
Haley A. Crim ◽  
Deb L. Morrison ◽  
Frank Niepold ◽  
Jen Kretser ◽  
...  

Inter- and intra-country inequalities hamper adaptation and resilience capacity to climate change. Achieving a climate resilient future requires long-term visions, system-oriented approaches, cross-sector collaborations, and good climate governance, while centering on equity and justice in policy making. Central to these governance efforts is an informed and active society with concrete mechanisms to influence decision making. Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE) provides the framework to attain climate policy coherence that integrates the capacities and needs of all members of society into ambitious and effective strategies. This paper proposes a novel approach to policy making, applied to the co-creation of a national climate empowerment plan for the United States that encompasses local participation, leadership, and consent. The approach is based on a combination of participatory backcasting and the Talanoa process structure and principles of multi-level, transdisciplinary, transparency and inclusive dialogues. The proposed approach is beneficial for the advancement of ambitious, practical, and flexible plans with broad-based buy-in from stakeholders ranging from policymakers to relevant actors to frontline and marginalized communities to institutions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. C04
Author(s):  
Wen Ke

Improving communications between scientists and policy makers have being received more and more attention in China. Based on negotiation-boundary work theory (Jasanoff, 1990), this paper presents an analysis of the interface between scientists and policy makers by drawing on the Strategic High-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program). The analysis indicates, first, that it is very important of science advice in China, the negotiation and the consensus between scientists and policy makers is vital for policy making; second, that it is dangerous to rely on Technocracy in China, the policy makers give up the discretion while influence experts’ decisions by controlling the consist of scientist advisory committee, which directly result in politicalizing academic research. For scientists and policy makers in China, they should redefine their respective authority boundary, and make the interaction process open and transparent.


2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1446-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
JANICE BESCH ◽  
JEFFREY MINSON

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. van Dijk ◽  
A. Hayton ◽  
D. C. J. Main ◽  
A. Booth ◽  
A. King ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document