The National Labor Market Consequences of U.S. Immigration

Author(s):  
Michael J. Greenwood ◽  
John M. McDowell
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun‐Keung Hoi ◽  
Ashok Robin

2020 ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
Vladimir Petrov

It is shown that as a result of the lack of synchronicity and balance between the virtual and real sectors of higher education, desynchronization of the ontology of education can occur. It is indicated that, in accordance with eco-nomictrends in the national higher system there can be a clear division into elite science-intensive high-tech competitive education and mass low-value low-tech “higher education” that is not in demand outside the national labor market.


ILR Review ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kaestner ◽  
Kosali Ilayperuma Simon

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1067-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn H. Block ◽  
Christian O. Fisch ◽  
James Lau ◽  
Martin Obschonka ◽  
André Presse

Family firms must attract talented employees to stay competitive. They have different employer characteristics than nonfamily firms. For example, although they generally offer lower wages, they also typically offer higher job security and a more cooperative and entrepreneurial work environment. However, drawing on occupational choice theory, we argue that the importance of these unique family firm characteristics depends on the national labor market context in which the family firm is embedded. A multilevel investigation of 12,746 individuals in 40 countries shows that individuals prefer to work in family firms in labor markets with flexible unregulated hiring and firing practices, centralized wage determination, and low labor–employer cooperation. A cross-level analysis further shows that the national labor market context moderates the effects of individual-level factors determining the preference to work in a family firm (e.g., entrepreneurship intention). Our article is the first to consider labor market institutions in research on family firms as employers. Practical implications exist for family firms regarding their employer branding and intrapreneurship strategies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (s1) ◽  
pp. 1170-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Fronstin ◽  
David H. Greenberg ◽  
Philip K. Robins

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Persson ◽  
Ulf-G. Gerdtham ◽  
Katarina Steen Carlsson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document