Therapeutic Alliance and Alliance Ruptures and Resolutions: Theoretical Definitions, Assessment Issues, and Research Findings

2014 ◽  
pp. 311-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Lingiardi ◽  
Antonello Colli
Psychology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (12) ◽  
pp. 1049-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Baillargeon ◽  
Robert Coté ◽  
Lyne Douville

Author(s):  
Brian A. Sharpless

:Ruptures (i.e., deteriorations or strains in the therapeutic alliance) are an inevitable part of any psychotherapy. They are not only common but are also clinically meaningful. If not adequately attended to, ruptures are associated with poor therapy outcome and premature termination. Fortunately, a strong research base is available that provides clinically useful guidance for identifying and resolving alliance ruptures. After a brief review of the theoretical and empirical literatures, a list of “markers” used to identify the two subtypes of ruptures (i.e., withdrawal and confrontation) is provided. Proper assessment of the subtype is critical, as they each require slightly different rupture resolution techniques across a four-stage process. Finally, a list of specific rupture resolution techniques is provided.


Author(s):  
Gianluca Lo Coco ◽  
Giorgio A. Tasca ◽  
Paul L. Hewitt ◽  
Samuel F. Mikail ◽  
Dennis M. Kivlighan, Jr.

Although previous studies investigated the characteristics of therapeutic alliance in group treatments, there is still a dearth of research on group alliance ruptures and repairs. The model by Safran and Muran was originally developed to address therapeutic alliance in individual therapies, and the usefulness of this approach to group intervention needs to be demonstrated. Alliance ruptures are possible at member to therapist, member to member, member to group levels. Moreover, repairs of ruptures in group are quite complex, i.e., because other group members have to process the rupture even if not directly involved. The aim of the current study is to review the empirical research on group alliance, and to examine whether the rupture repair model can be a suitable framework for clinical understanding and research of the complexity of therapeutic alliance in group treatments. We provide clinical vignettes and commentary to illustrate theoretical and research aspects of therapeutic alliance rupture and repair in groups. Our colleague Jeremy Safran made a substantial contribution to research on therapeutic alliance, and the current paper illustrates the enduring legacy of this work and its potential application to the group therapy context.


2022 ◽  
pp. 113-121
Author(s):  
James F. Boswell ◽  
Michael J. Constantino

Author(s):  
Volker Tschuschke ◽  
Margit Koemeda-Lutz ◽  
Agnes von Wyl ◽  
Aureliano Crameri ◽  
Peter Schulthess

AbstractThis article investigates distances between therapists and their clients in their experience of the therapeutic alliance across the duration of the psychotherapeutic treatments in a naturalistic study. We looked at the working alliances from different vantage points—rupture, repair of ruptures, distances in the alliance impressions of both clients and therapists—and their correlation with treatment outcome. The only predictive variable of alliance ruptures was the inability of therapists to bond sufficiently with their clients regarding a sustainable working atmosphere, which could be identified through a continuous distant alliance rating by the therapists. Alliance ruptures in turn significantly predicted premature termination of treatments, whereas alliance ruptures per se did not necessarily predict treatment outcome. The paper discusses the possible role of the quality of therapists’ attachment styles as a potentially crucial variable in an effective working alliance in psychotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document