Early Prognosis After Severe Human Head Injury Utilizing Multimodality Evoked Potentials

Author(s):  
R. P. Greenberg ◽  
J. D. Miller ◽  
D. P. Becker
1977 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Greenberg ◽  
Donald P. Becker ◽  
J. Douglas Miller ◽  
David J. Mayer

✓ Electrophysiological investigations were undertaken in 51 comatose patients with severe head trauma to locate areas of brain dysfunction and to relate the loci of dysfunction to the patient's posttraumatic neurological condition. On the basis of evoked potential data, the presence of decortication or decerebration depended on cerebral hemispheric dysfunction. Brain-stem dysfunction, defined by evoked potentials, did not correlate with posturing. On the other hand, impaired oculocephalic responses and bilateral abnormal pupillary light responses were associated with brainstem dysfunction, while hemispheric dysfunction did not correlate with either: Duration of coma was dependent on hemispheric dysfunction. Brain-stem dysfunction was not significantly associated with prolonged coma. Furthermore, 80% of the head trauma patients who had Grade I or II multimodality evoked brain-injury potentials recorded in the acute period following head trauma (mean Day 3) became responsive within 30 days of their injury. Graded somatosensory brain injury potentials appeared to be a powerful prognostic tool as they significantly correlated with the patient's final outcome even when recorded early after injury. Abnormal multimodality evoked potentials recorded acutely consistently defined dysfunction of the visual, auditory, and motor systems in comatose patients, and were considerably more effective than the clinical neurological examination in diagnosing persisting focal deficits of these systems.


1981 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Greenberg ◽  
Pauline G. Newlon ◽  
Marti S. Hyatt ◽  
Raj K. Narayan ◽  
Donald P. Becker

✓ Results of multimodality evoked potential (MEP) studies recorded from 100 comatose patients soon after severe head injury were analyzed prospectively, using a previously established grading system, to assess the prognostic value of MEP's with respect to patient outcome, to evaluate the effect of clinically relevant sequelae of head injury on the prediction of outcome by MEP's, and to describe time to clinical recovery as a function of initial MEP grade. Graded MEP's, when recorded in the first few days after head injury, could predict patient outcome at 1 year with approximately 80% accuracy. Exclusion from the analysis of patients who died from causes unrelated to the brain and those with severe systemic complications that occurred after the evoked potentials were recorded improved the accuracy of outcome prediction to nearly 100%. The presence of a mass lesion requiring surgery reduces the probability of good to moderate outcome for a given MEP grade group by approximately 25% to 40% from that seen in patients without mass lesions. The clinical outcome predicted shortly after head injury by MEP grades may not be realized for many months. Patients with mild MEP abnormality (Grade I or II) generally reach their outcome by 3 to 6 months, whereas those with more severe deficits (Grade III) may not show improvement for at least 1 year.


1977 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Greenberg ◽  
David J. Mayer ◽  
Donald P. Becker ◽  
J. Douglas Miller

✓ Methods for obtaining multimodality evoked potentials, somatosensory, visual, auditory, and auditory brain-stem potentials in patients with severe head trauma are described. A method of analyzing abnormal multimodality evoked potentials (graded evoked brain-injury potentials) is proposed that defines the degree of abnormality of the electrophysiological data and expresses it simply in four grades per modality. Data from 20 normal subjects are given for comparison with the abnormal data obtained from 51 patients with head trauma.


1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Sartucci ◽  
F. Marconi ◽  
E. Busso ◽  
B. Rossi ◽  
L. Murri

1984 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Anderson ◽  
S. Bundlie ◽  
G. L. Rockswold

2000 ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Reinert ◽  
B. Hoelper ◽  
E. Doppenberg ◽  
A. Zauner ◽  
R. Bullock
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document