Steric Sea-Level Change and its Impact on the Gravity Field caused by Global Climate Change

2008 ◽  
pp. 1131-1151
Author(s):  
Sabine Roedelsperger ◽  
Michael Kuhn ◽  
Oleg Makarynskyy ◽  
Carl Gerstenecker
2008 ◽  
Vol 165 (6) ◽  
pp. 1131-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Roedelsperger ◽  
Michael Kuhn ◽  
Oleg Makarynskyy ◽  
Carl Gerstenecker

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Yokoyama ◽  
Anthony Purcell

AbstractPast sea-level change represents the large-scale state of global climate, reflecting the waxing and waning of global ice sheets and the corresponding effect on ocean volume. Recent developments in sampling and analytical methods enable us to more precisely reconstruct past sea-level changes using geological indicators dated by radiometric methods. However, ice-volume changes alone cannot wholly account for these observations of local, relative sea-level change because of various geophysical factors including glacio-hydro-isostatic adjustments (GIA). The mechanisms behind GIA cannot be ignored when reconstructing global ice volume, yet they remain poorly understood within the general sea-level community. In this paper, various geophysical factors affecting sea-level observations are discussed and the details and impacts of these processes on estimates of past ice volumes are introduced.


2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert L.A. Vermeersen ◽  
Aimée B.A. Slangen ◽  
Theo Gerkema ◽  
Fedor Baart ◽  
Kim M. Cohen ◽  
...  

AbstractRising sea levels due to climate change can have severe consequences for coastal populations and ecosystems all around the world. Understanding and projecting sea-level rise is especially important for low-lying countries such as the Netherlands. It is of specific interest for vulnerable ecological and morphodynamic regions, such as the Wadden Sea UNESCO World Heritage region.Here we provide an overview of sea-level projections for the 21st century for the Wadden Sea region and a condensed review of the scientific data, understanding and uncertainties underpinning the projections. The sea-level projections are formulated in the framework of the geological history of the Wadden Sea region and are based on the regional sea-level projections published in the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5). These IPCC AR5 projections are compared against updates derived from more recent literature and evaluated for the Wadden Sea region. The projections are further put into perspective by including interannual variability based on long-term tide-gauge records from observing stations at Den Helder and Delfzijl.We consider three climate scenarios, following the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), as defined in IPCC AR5: the RCP2.6 scenario assumes that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions decline after 2020; the RCP4.5 scenario assumes that GHG emissions peak at 2040 and decline thereafter; and the RCP8.5 scenario represents a continued rise of GHG emissions throughout the 21st century. For RCP8.5, we also evaluate several scenarios from recent literature where the mass loss in Antarctica accelerates at rates exceeding those presented in IPCC AR5.For the Dutch Wadden Sea, the IPCC AR5-based projected sea-level rise is 0.07±0.06m for the RCP4.5 scenario for the period 2018–30 (uncertainties representing 5–95%), with the RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios projecting 0.01m less and more, respectively. The projected rates of sea-level change in 2030 range between 2.6mma−1for the 5th percentile of the RCP2.6 scenario to 9.1mma−1for the 95th percentile of the RCP8.5 scenario. For the period 2018–50, the differences between the scenarios increase, with projected changes of 0.16±0.12m for RCP2.6, 0.19±0.11m for RCP4.5 and 0.23±0.12m for RCP8.5. The accompanying rates of change range between 2.3 and 12.4mma−1in 2050. The differences between the scenarios amplify for the 2018–2100 period, with projected total changes of 0.41±0.25m for RCP2.6, 0.52±0.27m for RCP4.5 and 0.76±0.36m for RCP8.5. The projections for the RCP8.5 scenario are larger than the high-end projections presented in the 2008 Delta Commission Report (0.74m for 1990–2100) when the differences in time period are considered. The sea-level change rates range from 2.2 to 18.3mma−1for the year 2100.We also assess the effect of accelerated ice mass loss on the sea-level projections under the RCP8.5 scenario, as recent literature suggests that there may be a larger contribution from Antarctica than presented in IPCC AR5 (potentially exceeding 1m in 2100). Changes in episodic extreme events, such as storm surges, and periodic (tidal) contributions on (sub-)daily timescales, have not been included in these sea-level projections. However, the potential impacts of these processes on sea-level change rates have been assessed in the report.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Hadikusumah

Study on mean sea level (MSL) rise has been done on tide data at some locations in the Western Indonesia. To account the effect of climate change, air temperature analyses from some weather stations are also performed. The results showed that air temperature has changed between 0.0 to 0.44°C per ten years. The sea level analysis showed that mean sea level at Western Indonesia rise between 3.10 to 9.27 mm per year. Based on the results, the prediction on mean sea level change in the years of 2000, 2030, 2050 and 2100 for Cirebon location are 17 cm, 39 cm, 55 cm, and 92 cm, respectively.


2020 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 106346
Author(s):  
Sanja Faivre ◽  
Tatjana Bakran-Petricioli ◽  
Jadranka Barešić ◽  
Davor Horvatić ◽  
Kita Macario

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Uebbing ◽  
Christina Lück ◽  
Roelof Rietbroek ◽  
Kristin Vielberg ◽  
Jürgen Kusche

<p>Understanding present day sea level changes and their drivers requires the separation of the total sea level change into individual mass and steric related contributions. Total sea level rise has been observed continuously since 1993 providing a more than 25 year long time series of global and regional sea level variations. However, direct monitoring of ocean mass change has only been done since the start of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission in 2002. It ended in 2017 and was succeeded by the follow-on mission (GRACE-FO) in 2018 leaving a gap of about 1 year. In the same time period of GRACE, since the early 2000s, a global array of freely drifting Argo floats samples temperature and salinity profiles of up to 2000m depth which can be converted to steric sea level change.</p><p>By combining altimetry, GRACE(-FO) and Argo data sets it is possible to derive global and regional sea level budgets. The conventional approach is to analyze at least two of the data sets and derive the residual, or compare with the third one. A more recent approach is the global joint inversion method (Rietbroek et al., 2016) which fits forward-modeled spatial fingerprints to a combination of GRACE gravity data and Jason-1/-2 satellite altimetry data. This enables us, additionally, to separate altimetric sea level change into mass contributions from terrestrial hydrology, the melting of land glaciers and the ice-sheets in Greenland and Antarctica as well as contributions from steric sea level changes due to variations in ocean temperature and salinity. It also allows to include a data weighting scheme in the analysis.</p><p>Here, we present global and regional sea level budget results from an updated inversion based on multi-mission altimetry (Jason-1/-2/-3, Envisat, Cryosat-2, Sentinel-3, …) providing better spatial coverage as well as new RL06 GRACE and GRACE-FO data which enables us to extend the time series of individual components of the sea level budget beyond the GRACE era from 2002-04 till 2019-06. The presented sea level budget is closed on global scale with a residual (unexplained) contribution of about 0.1 mm/yr, globally, originating in eddy-active regions. We provide consistent validation of our results against conventionally analyzed altimetry and GRACE data sets where we find agreement on global scales to be better than 0.1 mm/yr but a larger disagreement at regional scales as well as the implications of our results for deriving ocean heat content. We will also provide first results for filling the gap in the sea level budget estimates due to the gap between the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions by additionally incorporating time-variable gravity information from the Swarm mission as well as from Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) to 5 satellites (Lageos-1/-2, Stella, Starlette, Ajisai).</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Wallinga ◽  
Torbjörn E. Törnqvist ◽  
Freek S. Busschers ◽  
Henk J. T. Weerts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document