Segmental Pancreatectomy for Small Pancreatic Cancer

Author(s):  
Seiki Tashiro ◽  
Hidenori Miyake
Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Akio ◽  
H Maguchi ◽  
K Takahashi ◽  
M Osanai ◽  
K Nakahara ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Ishii ◽  
Masahiro Serikawa ◽  
Tomofumi Tsuboi ◽  
Ryota Kawamura ◽  
Ken Tsushima ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among all cancers, and early diagnosis is essential for improving the prognosis. Along with radiologic modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic modalities play an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This review evaluates the roles of two of those modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS can detect pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and has excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. EUS may be useful for the surveillance of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are also useful for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, even for small pancreatic cancer, and is an essential examination method for the definitive pathological diagnosis and treatment decision strategy. On the other hand, ERCP is invasive and performed less frequently for the purpose of diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, ERCP is essential in cases that require evaluation of pancreatic duct stricture that may be early pancreatic cancer or those that require differentiation from focal autoimmune pancreatitis.


Pancreas ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 943-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Kurita ◽  
Hiroyuki Maguchi ◽  
Kuniyuki Takahashi ◽  
Akio Katanuma ◽  
Manabu Osanai ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsusuke Satake ◽  
Yong-Suk Chung ◽  
Hideki Yokomatsu ◽  
Bunzo Nakata ◽  
Tetsuji Sawada ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S92-S96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Irisawa ◽  
Ai Sato ◽  
Masaki Sato ◽  
Tsunehiko Ikeda ◽  
Rei Suzuki ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kensuke Tanioka ◽  
Yuki Kawaji ◽  
Takashi Tamura ◽  
Junya Nuta ◽  
...  

This study aimed to assess whether contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), compared to multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for early diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer (PC). Between March 2010 and June 2018, all three imaging modalities and surgery were performed for patients with a pancreatic solid lesion measuring ≤20 mm; diagnostic ability was compared among modalities. Fifty-one of 60 patients were diagnosed with PC (PC size in 41 patients: 11–20 mm; 10 patients: ≤10 mm). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (11–20 mm) detection were 95%/83%/94%, 78%/83%/79%, and 73%/33%/68%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS was significantly superior compared with MDCT and MRI (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (≤10 mm) detection were 70%/100%/77%, 20%/100%/38%, and 50%/100%/62%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS tended to be superior to that of MDCT (p = 0.025). The sensitivity of MDCT for PC (≤10 mm) detection was significantly lower than that for PC (11–20 mm) detection (20% vs. 78%; p = 0.001). CH-EUS, compared to MDCT and MRI, is useful for diagnosing small PCs.


Pancreas ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. e102-e113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiyo Ikeda ◽  
Kensei Maeshiro ◽  
Shinichiro Ryu ◽  
Kenji Ogata ◽  
Yohichi Yasunami ◽  
...  

Suizo ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki NAGAI ◽  
Michihiko WADA ◽  
Ryo HOSOTANI ◽  
Tatehiro KAJIWARA

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuzo Terada ◽  
Masataka Kikuyama ◽  
Shinya Kawaguchi ◽  
Hideyuki Kanemoto ◽  
Yoshihiro Yokoi ◽  
...  

Backgrounds: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is used to observe the stricture of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) and in diagnosing pancreatic cancer (PC). We investigate the findings on EUS by referring to the histopathological findings of resected specimens. Materials and Methods: Six patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) and 30 patients with invasive carcinoma of 20 mm or less were included. The preoperative EUS findings were classified as follows. A1: Simple stricture type—no findings around the stricture; A2: Hypoecho stricture type—localized hypoechoic area without demarcation around the stricture; A3: Tumor stricture type—tumor on the stricture; B: Dilation type—the dilation of the pancreatic duct without a downstream stricture; C: Parenchymal tumor type—tumor located apart from the MPD. Results: Classes A1 and A2 consisted of 2 CISs, and 4 invasive carcinomas included two cases smaller than 5 mm in diameter. Most of the cancers classified as A3 or C were of invasive carcinoma larger than 5 mm in diameter. All cancers classified as B involved CIS. Serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) was selected for all types of cases, with a sensitivity of 92.0%, while EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNA) was only useful for invasive carcinoma, and its sensitivity was 66.7%. Conclusions: Stricture without a tumor could be a finding for invasive PC and pancreatic duct dilation without a downstream stricture could be a finding indicative of CIS. Carcinoma smaller than 5 mm in diameter could not be recognized by EUS. SPACE had a high sensitivity for diagnosing small PC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document