Histopathologic Findings Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis of Patients with Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Yukihiro Nakanishi
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxin Yang ◽  
Zhouyi Lu ◽  
Lintao Li ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Yulong Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis. Results: We included 28 articles containing data for 5041 patients (range: 29-498) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.62 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.17-2.26; p = 0.004) and the odds ratio between LVI and LNM was 5.7 with 95% CI (4.43-7.33; p < 0.0001). LVI in patients diagnosed with SEC results in a poor OS rate and a higher rate of LNM. Conclusions: The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC.Keywords: Lymphovascular invasion; lymph node metastasis; prognosis; superficial esophageal carcinoma


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxin Yang ◽  
Zhouyi Lu ◽  
An Wang ◽  
Yulong Tan ◽  
Dekang Zhang

Abstract Background:The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear.Methods:We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis.Results:We included 28 articles containing data for 5041 patients (range: 29-498) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.62 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.17-2.26; p = 0.004) and the odds ratio between LVI and LNM was 5.7 with 95% CI (4.43-7.33; p < 0.0001). LVI in patients diagnosed with SEC results in a poor OS rate and a higher rate of LNM.Conclusions:The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC.Keywords: Lymphovascular invasion; lymph node metastasis; prognosis; superficial esophageal carcinoma


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxin Yang ◽  
Zhouyi Lu ◽  
Lintao Li ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Yulong Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis. Results: We included 23 articles containing data for 4749 patients (range: 54-598) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.85 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.10-3.11, P = 0.02). LNM rate was higher in SEC patients with LVI than SEC patients without LVI (univariate: OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 3.74-6.53, P < 0.0001; multivariate: OR = 5.72, 95%CI: 4.38-7.4, P < 0.0001). No obvious publication was found. Conclusions: The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC. Keywords: Lymphovascular invasion; lymph node metastasis; prognosis; superficial esophageal carcinoma


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruzhen Jia ◽  
Qinsong Luan ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Dongsheng Hou ◽  
Shulei Zhao

In order to predict related risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) and provide reference for endoscopic minimally invasive treatment, we included a total of 93 patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma who have underwent esophagectomy and lymph node dissection from 2010 to 2015. The depth of invasion was remeasured and classified into 6 groups according to their wall penetration. The prediction model was founded based on the independent risk factors. The results shows that lymph node metastasis of m1, m2, m3, sm1, sm2, and sm3 of superficial esophageal carcinoma was 0%, 0%, 5.3%, 8.7%, 17.6%, and 37.5%, respectively. The tumor size, differentiation, and lymphvascular invasion were also significantly related to lymph node metastasis by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model for lymph node metastasis was established as follows: p=ex/(1+ex), and x = −5.469 + 0.839 × depth of invasion + 1.992 × lymphavascular metastasis. The area under ROC curve was 0.858 (95% CI: 0.757–0.959). It was also shown that the depth of invasion was related to tumor differentiation, macroscopic type, and tumor size.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxin Yang ◽  
Zhouyi Lu ◽  
Lintao Li ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Yulong Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis. Results: We included 23 articles containing data for 4749 patients (range: 54-598) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.85 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.10-3.11, P = 0.02). LNM rate was higher in SEC patients with LVI than SEC patients without LVI (univariate: OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 3.74-6.53, P < 0.0001; multivariate: OR = 5.72, 95%CI: 4.38-7.4, P < 0.0001). No obvious publication was found. Conclusions: The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxin Yang ◽  
Zhouyi Lu ◽  
Lintao Li ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Yulong Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis. Results: We included 23 articles containing data for 4749 patients (range: 54-598) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.85 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.10-3.11, P = 0.02). LNM rate was higher in SEC patients with LVI than SEC patients without LVI (univariate: OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 3.74-6.53, P < 0.0001; multivariate: OR = 5.72, 95%CI: 4.38-7.4, P < 0.0001). No obvious publication was found. Conclusions: The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC. Keywords: Lymphovascular invasion; lymph node metastasis; prognosis; superficial esophageal carcinoma


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document