Help in Every Direction: Supporting Beginning Science Teachers in New Zealand

2003 ◽  
pp. 141-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Britton ◽  
Senta Raizen ◽  
Mary Ann Huntley
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Rofe ◽  
Azra Moeed ◽  
Dayle Anderson ◽  
Rex Bartholomew

School science aspires for students to develop conceptual, procedural and nature of science understandings as well as developing scientific literacy. Issues and complexities surrounding the development of science curriculum for Indigenous schools in New Zealand is a concern as little is known about these aspects of science learning in wharekura (Māori Indigenous School). This paper draws upon the findings of an empirical study to address the call for research into effective practices for supporting Indigenous students in learning science. The study is part of a larger project investigating and extending our understanding about how New Zealand teachers’ conceptualise science and science inquiry (investigation). Two Māori teachers participated in the research as well as their class who were supported by two researchers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with teachers. This research reports the findings of how participating teachers’ conceptualise science inquiry and describes their perceptions of how and why their students should learn science and science inquiry. The paper also presents teachers’ views about their own development as science teachers and suggests two models to address the issue of science teaching in wharekura.


1967 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannette Schneiweiss ◽  
Jerry B. Davis

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Stroupe

A lack of coherence about norms for instruction between preparation contexts often results in tensions for beginners about learning to teach. I wondered if planning tools created in a university setting, designed to support ambitious instruction, could act as boundary objects to help novices bring ambitious teaching into classrooms. As such, I examined how three participants used the tools to plan for ambitious instruction in ways that changed their own understanding of subject matter and pedagogy. Their mentor teachers, however, prompted the novices to use the tools and teach in ways that were inconsistent with the participants’ planning. I found that the tools prompted the novices to try out pieces of ambitious instruction, yet the tools alone do not encourage coherence or communication between beginning and mentor teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document