An Industrial Implementation of a Model Based Control Strategy

Author(s):  
J. L. Figueroa ◽  
O. E. Agamennoni ◽  
G. W. Barton ◽  
J. A. Romagnoli ◽  
J. B. Lear
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Morlacchi ◽  
Ferruccio Resta ◽  
Francesco Ripamonti ◽  
Gisella Tomasini

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (7) ◽  
pp. 1459-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Mears ◽  
Stuart M. Stocks ◽  
Mads O. Albaek ◽  
Benny Cassells ◽  
Gürkan Sin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ahmad Reda ◽  
József Vásárhelyi

AbstractDespite the advanced technologies used in recent years, the lack of robust systems still exists. The automated steering system is a critical and complex task in the domain of the autonomous vehicle’s applications. This paper is a part of project that deals with model-based control strategy as one of the most common control strategies. The main objective is to present the implementations of Model Predictive Control (MPC) for an autonomous vehicle steering system in regards to trajectory tracking application. The obtained results are analysed and the efficiency of the use of MPC controller were discussed based on its behaviour and performance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 387-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.S. Kim ◽  
Y.J. Kim ◽  
S.P. Cheon ◽  
G.D. Baek ◽  
S.S. Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wenbo Sui ◽  
Carrie M Hall

Because fuel efficiency is significantly affected by the timing of combustion in internal combustion engines, accurate control of combustion phasing is critical. In this paper, a nonlinear combustion phasing model is introduced and calibrated, and both a feedforward model–based control strategy and an adaptive model–based control strategy are investigated for combustion phasing control. The combustion phasing model combines a knock integral model, burn duration model, and a Wiebe function to predict the combustion phasing of a diesel engine. This model is simplified to be more suitable for combustion phasing control and is calibrated and validated using simulations and experimental data that include conditions with high exhaust gas recirculation fractions and high boost levels. Based on this model, an adaptive nonlinear model–based controller is designed for closed-loop control, and a feedforward model–based controller is designed for open-loop control. These two control approaches were tested in simulations. The simulation results show that during transient changes, the CA50 (the crank angle at which 50% of the mass of fuel has burned) can reach steady state in no more than five cycles and the steady-state errors are less than ±0.1 crank angle degree for adaptive control and less than ±0.5 crank angle degree for feedforward model–based control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document