Probabilistic Argumentation Systems

2000 ◽  
pp. 221-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Haenni ◽  
J. Kohlas ◽  
N. Lehmann
Keyword(s):  
Probabilistic Argumentation ◽  
Argumentation Systems

scholarly journals Probabilistic Argumentation Systems with Decision Variables

Informatica ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18
Author(s):  
Bernhard Anrig ◽  
Dalia Baziukaitė
Keyword(s):  
Decision Variables ◽  
Probabilistic Argumentation ◽  
Argumentation Systems

scholarly journals Probabilistic argumentation systems

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 225-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürg Kohlas
Keyword(s):  
Probabilistic Argumentation ◽  
Argumentation Systems

An alternative transient solution for semi-Markov queuing systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Revaz Kakubava
Keyword(s):  
Queuing System ◽  
Queuing Systems ◽  
Transient Solution ◽  
Methods Of Analysis ◽  
Supplementary Variables ◽  
Probabilistic Argumentation

AbstractBy using a purely probabilistic argumentation, two theorems are proved. They simplify the existing methods of analysis for the {M/G/1} queuing system by means of the supplementary variables method.

scholarly journals Probabilistic Argumentation: An Equational Approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Gabbay ◽  
O. Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Probabilistic Argumentation

Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY HUNTER
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Hybrid Systems ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Graphical Notation ◽  
The Real ◽  
News Reports ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Argumentation Systems

Numerous argumentation systems have been proposed in the literature. Yet there often appears to be a shortfall between proposed systems and possible applications. In other words, there seems to be a need for further development of proposals for argumentation systems before they can be used widely in decision-support or knowledge management. I believe that this shortfall can be bridged by taking a hybrid approach. Whilst formal foundations are vital, systems that incorporate some of the practical ideas found in some of the informal approaches may make the resulting hybrid systems more useful. In informal approaches, there is often an emphasis on using graphical notation with symbols that relate more closely to the real-world concepts to be modelled. There may also be the incorporation of an argument ontology oriented to the user domain. Furthermore, in informal approaches there can be greater consideration of how users interact with the models, such as allowing users to edit arguments and to weight influences on graphs representing arguments. In this paper, I discuss some of the features of argumentation, review some key formal argumentation systems, identify some of the strengths and weaknesses of these formal proposals and finally consider some ways to develop formal proposals to give hybrid argumentation systems. To focus my discussions, I will consider some applications, in particular an application in analysing structured news reports.

scholarly journals Change in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems

2015 ◽  
pp. 314-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudette Cayrol ◽  
Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex
Keyword(s):  
Argumentation Systems
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document