Relationship Between Electromyostimulation and Free Weight Exercises in Multiple Repetition Maximum Strength Test

2017 ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
R. N. J. R. Hussain ◽  
K. M. Kee ◽  
R. Razman ◽  
S. I. Ismail ◽  
M. Shari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Free Weight

ONE REPETITION MAXIMUM STRENGTH TEST IN HEART FAILURE

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 306
Author(s):  
Gregory Palevo ◽  
Douglas J. Pearce ◽  
Mark F. Aaron
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum

scholarly journals Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Schayer Sabino ◽  
Diogo Carvalho Felício ◽  
Cristiano Queiroz Guimarães ◽  
Bento João da Graça Azevedo Abreu ◽  
Wouber Hérickson de Brito Vieira
Keyword(s):  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Validity Analysis

The Effects of Combined Elastic- and Free-Weight Tension vs. Free-Weight Tension on One-Repetition Maximum Strength in the Bench Press

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Bellar ◽  
Matthew D Muller ◽  
Jacob E Barkley ◽  
Chul-Ho Kim ◽  
Keisuke Ida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bench Press ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Free Weight

Validität eines 5-RM Krafttests im Gesundheits- und Fitnesssport

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Assessment ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Recreational Sports ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Recreational Athletes ◽  
Strength Tests ◽  
One Year ◽  
Training Control

Appropriate alternatives to the 1-RM strength test are multiple repetition maximum strength tests, particularly considering recreational sports. In contrast to the 1-RM strength test, limited research of multiple repetition maximum strength tests has been conducted and thus causes a shortage of standardized and evaluated test protocols. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a 5-repetition maximum strength test, which excellent reliability was already confirmed, for the purposes of performance assessment and training control in recreational sports. Twenty-six healthy recreational athletes (25.9 ± 3.4 years;181.2 ± 5.1 cm;79.4 ± 8.7 kg) with at least one year experience of strength training completed two examinations, which implied a bench press exercise. In examination one, the 5-RM and the 1-RM was determined. The objective of the second examination was to identify the maximum of possible repetitions at a sub maximum intensity of 90%. The very high correlation (r = 0.97;p < 0.001) between the 5-RM and the 1-RM confirms the qualification of the 5-RM as indicator of the maximum strength for performance assessment. The clearly lower variance of the 5-RM (CV = 15.8%) in comparison to the 1-RM (CV = 36.2%) can be seen as verification of the more optimal suitability to determine the training intensity within the training control. In conclusion, the 5-RM strength test is a valid measurement method in recreational sports. Besides the less physical stress and less injury risk, multiple repetition maximum strength tests such as the 5-RM strength test allow a more effective training control as the 1-RM strength test.

scholarly journals One-repetition maximum strength test represents a valid means to assess leg strengthin vivoin humans

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lex B. Verdijk ◽  
Luc van Loon ◽  
Kenneth Meijer ◽  
Hans H. C. M. Savelberg
Keyword(s):  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum

scholarly journals Reproducibility of a 5-repetition maximum strength test in older adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Gail ◽  
Steffen Rodefeld ◽  
Stefan Künzell
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Repetition Maximum

Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 2205-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amador García-Ramos ◽  
Paola Barboza-González ◽  
David Ulloa-Díaz ◽  
Angela Rodriguez-Perea ◽  
Darío Martinez-Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Free Weight ◽  
The One

scholarly journals The reliability of the one maximum repetition in sedentary, active and strength-trained subjects

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Leandro Tiggemann ◽  
Matheus Giacobbo Guedes ◽  
Roberta Bgeginski ◽  
Ronei Silveira Pinto ◽  
Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Keyword(s):  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Critical Behavior ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Trained Subjects ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Leg Press ◽  
Coefficient Corrélation ◽  
The One

The aim of the study was to verify the reliability of one maximum repetition (1-RM) in three different groups, according levels of physical fitness. The sample was composed for thirty subjects (aged 18 to 34 years old) divided in three groups with ten subjects each: sedentary (SG), physical active (PAG) and strength-trained (STG). The subjects were submitted to two familiarization sessions and two sessions of maximum strength test (1-RM1 and 1-RM2) at the following exercises: bench press and 45º leg press. The comparison between 1-RM values was made by two-way ANOVA (test and group) and association between both by intraclass coefficient correlation (p ≤ 0.05). Data presented high correlation values between both tests (from 0.922 to 0.997; p < 0.001), however, significant differences (p < 0.05) was observed between 1-RM1 and 1-RM2 at bench press exercise in SG (56.40 ± 8.00 kg e 57.60 ± 7.89 kg, respectively), PAG (68,80 ± 9,26 kg e 69,40 ± 8,78 kg, respectively) and STG (87.20 ± 19.94 kg e 88.60 ± 19.86 kg, respectively), as well in the leg press in SG (222,5 ± 38,24 kg e 229,50 ± 38,55 kg, respectively), PAG (238.50 ± 26.25 kg e 244.00 ± 24.70, respectively) and STG (321.50 ± 46.19 kg e 336.40 ± 40.44 kg, respectively). It can be concluded that the subject’s level of physical fitness does not appear to be a critical behavior at 1-RM reliability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document