Object Proposals-Based Significance Map for Image Retargeting

Author(s):  
Diptiben Patel ◽  
Shanmuganathan Raman
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoting Fan ◽  
Jianjun Lei ◽  
Jie Liang ◽  
Yuming Fang ◽  
Xiaochun Cao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yijing Mei ◽  
Xiaojie Guo ◽  
Di Sun ◽  
Gang Pan ◽  
Jiawan Zhang
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1798-1805
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Liu ◽  
Yiheng Han ◽  
Zipeng Ye ◽  
Yu-Kun Lai

Author(s):  
Tongwei Ren ◽  
Yanwen Guo ◽  
Gangshan Wu ◽  
Fuyan Zhang
Keyword(s):  

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6450
Author(s):  
Taimur Hassan ◽  
Muhammad Shafay ◽  
Samet Akçay ◽  
Salman Khan ◽  
Mohammed Bennamoun ◽  
...  

Screening baggage against potential threats has become one of the prime aviation security concerns all over the world, where manual detection of prohibited items is a time-consuming and hectic process. Many researchers have developed autonomous systems to recognize baggage threats using security X-ray scans. However, all of these frameworks are vulnerable against screening cluttered and concealed contraband items. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no framework possesses the capacity to recognize baggage threats across multiple scanner specifications without an explicit retraining process. To overcome this, we present a novel meta-transfer learning-driven tensor-shot detector that decomposes the candidate scan into dual-energy tensors and employs a meta-one-shot classification backbone to recognize and localize the cluttered baggage threats. In addition, the proposed detection framework can be well-generalized to multiple scanner specifications due to its capacity to generate object proposals from the unified tensor maps rather than diversified raw scans. We have rigorously evaluated the proposed tensor-shot detector on the publicly available SIXray and GDXray datasets (containing a cumulative of 1,067,381 grayscale and colored baggage X-ray scans). On the SIXray dataset, the proposed framework achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.6457, and on the GDXray dataset, it achieved the precision and F1 score of 0.9441 and 0.9598, respectively. Furthermore, it outperforms state-of-the-art frameworks by 8.03% in terms of mAP, 1.49% in terms of precision, and 0.573% in terms of F1 on the SIXray and GDXray dataset, respectively.


Author(s):  
Keisuke Nonaka ◽  
Takamichi Miyata ◽  
Yoshinori Hatori
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document