The new Japanese Firm as a Hybrid Organization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuharu Miyamoto
1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Michael L. Gerlach ◽  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  
Ronald Dore

2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (10) ◽  
pp. 496-502

Prima Subsidiary Breakthrough in Malaria Experiments. Biota Achieves HIV Drug Breakthrough. China Business News. Sino-French Collaboration. US to Export Synthetic DNA to Japanese Firm. Genesis and EvoGenix Collaborates to Discover Anti-Inflammatory Drug. Biomedical Strategy Consultants Marches into Europe. Athelas and MerLion to Work Together on Anti-Infectives. BioPhotoFullerenes to Open HQ in Taiwan. Kiotek to Produce Medical-Standard Chitosan. TaiGen to Buy Microbubble Drug Delivery Technology. Intel Launches Itanium2 Server to Address Bioinformatics Market.


Author(s):  
Gerry Yemen ◽  
Kristin J. Behfar ◽  
Allison Elias

Most talented executives can recognize when an acquisition has strategic or financial benefits, and in this case, the decision to be acquired was an appropriate exit strategy for a successful start-up. Peter Street’s start-up had been growing quickly and was building a reputation for reliability in a booming industry when a Japanese firm offered to pay a premium for the U.S. firm. Having done business in Japan (and extensively with the acquiring company) before the sale of his company, Street entered the acquisition with enthusiasm. As part of the deal, Street’s former company would continue to operate in the United States as a division of its parent company and Street would remain as CEO. A few months into the transition, however, Street discovered a huge difference between working with and working for the Japanese firm. Cultural norms for confronting seemingly small problems quickly became bigger operational issues, and Street experienced a growing dichotomy between corporate (in Japan) and his division (in the United States). This case focuses on the challenges of implementing a cross-border acquisition.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-574
Author(s):  
Richard Wilson

Abstract Hybrid churches adopt some local business practices and identities in order to create a place and role in secular public space for a public engagement.1 They use hospitality and embassy to challenge the basis of public engagement, discourse, objectives and goals. Hybrid organization alongside hospitality and embassy enables the creation of alternative public spaces in which engagement and discourse may take place according to an alternative communicative base to conventional public discourse, intentionally to critique secular conventions of public presence and discourse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document