On Camera Calibration and Distortion Correction Based on Bundle Adjustment

2021 ◽  
pp. 429-441
Author(s):  
Huang Weilong ◽  
Jin Lizuo
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1091
Author(s):  
Izaak Van Crombrugge ◽  
Rudi Penne ◽  
Steve Vanlanduit

Knowledge of precise camera poses is vital for multi-camera setups. Camera intrinsics can be obtained for each camera separately in lab conditions. For fixed multi-camera setups, the extrinsic calibration can only be done in situ. Usually, some markers are used, like checkerboards, requiring some level of overlap between cameras. In this work, we propose a method for cases with little or no overlap. Laser lines are projected on a plane (e.g., floor or wall) using a laser line projector. The pose of the plane and cameras is then optimized using bundle adjustment to match the lines seen by the cameras. To find the extrinsic calibration, only a partial overlap between the laser lines and the field of view of the cameras is needed. Real-world experiments were conducted both with and without overlapping fields of view, resulting in rotation errors below 0.5°. We show that the accuracy is comparable to other state-of-the-art methods while offering a more practical procedure. The method can also be used in large-scale applications and can be fully automated.


Author(s):  
P. Wiącek

Abstract. Due to the increasing range of work carried out with UAV in recent years, the importance of final product accuracy appreciates. However, obtaining survey-grade accuracy requires to perform bundle adjustment processes that could be affected by multiple factors like unstable camera calibration, a correlation between interior and exterior orientation, insufficient georeferenced information, and software settings. During the project, multi-variant flight over the test field was conducted. The flights were performed with a fixed-wing airframe equipped with PPK receiver on-board. Based on the conducted flights, the database for multifactorial data sets has been prepared. The database containing hundreds of independent adjustment variants which differ as follows: georeferencing method, flight configuration, additional camera calibration corrections, tie points filtering, and a priori accuracy settings. The database allowed to investigate the separate influence of each factor on the final results using ANOVA statistical models.


Author(s):  
A. R. Yusoff ◽  
M. F. M. Ariff ◽  
K. M. Idris ◽  
Z. Majid ◽  
A. K. Chong

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) can be used to acquire highly accurate data in deformation survey, whereby low-cost digital cameras are commonly used in the UAV mapping. Thus, camera calibration is considered important in obtaining high-accuracy UAV mapping using low-cost digital cameras. The main focus of this study was to calibrate the UAV camera at different camera distances and check the measurement accuracy. The scope of this study included camera calibration in the laboratory and on the field, and the UAV image mapping accuracy assessment used calibration parameters of different camera distances. The camera distances used for the image calibration acquisition and mapping accuracy assessment were 1.5 metres in the laboratory, and 15 and 25 metres on the field using a Sony NEX6 digital camera. A large calibration field and a portable calibration frame were used as the tools for the camera calibration and for checking the accuracy of the measurement at different camera distances. Bundle adjustment concept was applied in Australis software to perform the camera calibration and accuracy assessment. The results showed that the camera distance at 25 metres is the optimum object distance as this is the best accuracy obtained from the laboratory as well as outdoor mapping. In conclusion, the camera calibration at several camera distances should be applied to acquire better accuracy in mapping and the best camera parameter for the UAV image mapping should be selected for highly accurate mapping measurement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document