On the Security of a Certificateless Public Verification Scheme for Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical-Social Systems

Both educational and health care organizations are in a constant state of change, whether triggered by national, regional, local, or organization-level policy. The speech-language pathologist/audiologist-administrator who aids in the planning and implementation of these changes, however, may not be familiar with the expansive literature on change in organizations. Further, how organizational change is planned and implemented is likely affected by leaders' and administrators' personal conceptualizations of social power, which may affect how front line clinicians experience organizational change processes. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to introduce the speech-language pathologist/audiologist-administrator to a research-based classification system for theories of change and to review the concept of power in social systems. Two prominent approaches to change in organizations are reviewed and then discussed as they relate to one another as well as to social conceptualizations of power.

Download Full-text

Men in organizations: An approach to social systems analysis

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e611312012-380 ◽

1972 ◽

Author(s):

Walter L. Wilkins ◽

Blair W. McDonald ◽

Allen Jones ◽

Lee Murdy ◽

Lawrence R. James ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systems Analysis ◽

Social Systems

Download Full-text

Structural and dynamic effects of social systems on evaluative responses to social groups

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e633962013-868 ◽

2006 ◽

Author(s):

Anesu N. Mandisodza ◽

John T. Jos ◽

Gyorgy Hunyady

Keyword(s):

Social Systems ◽

Social Groups ◽

Dynamic Effects

Download Full-text

New research frameworks in the study of chimpanzee and gorilla sociality and communication

10.32942/osf.io/d8j3r ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Sam G. B. Roberts ◽

Anna Roberts

Keyword(s):

Social Evolution ◽

Social Complexity ◽

Brain Size ◽

Social Systems ◽

Strongly Correlated ◽

The Social ◽

Human Social Evolution ◽

Research Frameworks ◽

New Research ◽

Large Groups

Group size in primates is strongly correlated with brain size, but exactly what makes larger groups more ‘socially complex’ than smaller groups is still poorly understood. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) are among our closest living relatives and are excellent model species to investigate patterns of sociality and social complexity in primates, and to inform models of human social evolution. The aim of this paper is to propose new research frameworks, particularly the use of social network analysis, to examine how social structure differs in small, medium and large groups of chimpanzees and gorillas, to explore what makes larger groups more socially complex than smaller groups. Given a fission-fusion system is likely to have characterised hominins, a comparison of the social complexity involved in fission-fusion and more stable social systems is likely to provide important new insights into human social evolution

Download Full-text

Keynote

Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management ◽

10.33114/adim.2017.225 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeanne LIEDTKA

Keyword(s):

Organizational Performance ◽

Design Thinking ◽

Social Systems ◽

Field Research ◽

Higher Order ◽

Lens Design ◽

Social Sector ◽

Extensive Field ◽

Innovative Solutions ◽

The Impact

The value delivered by design thinking is almost always seen to be improvements in the creativity and usefulness of the solutions produced. This paper takes a broader view of the potential power of design thinking, highlighting its role as a social technology for enhancing the productivity of conversations for change across difference. Examined through this lens, design thinking can be observed to aid diverse sets of stakeholders’ abilities to work together to both produce higher order, more innovative solutions and to implement them more successfully. In this way, it acts as a facilitator of the processes of collectives, by enhancing their ability to learn, align and change together. This paper draws on both the author’s extensive field research on the use of design thinking in social sector organizations, as well as on the literature of complex social systems, to discuss implications for both practitioners and scholars interested in assessing the impact of design thinking on organizational performance.

Download Full-text

Managing uncertainty in healthcare interpreter-mediated interaction

Communication & Medicine ◽

10.1558/cam.38677 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (2) ◽

pp. 150-164

Author(s):

Claudio Baraldi ◽

Laura Gavioli

Keyword(s):

Systems Theory ◽

Conversation Analysis ◽

Social Systems ◽

Analytical Framework ◽

Social Systems Theory ◽

Intercultural Mediators ◽

Or History

This paper analyses healthcare interactions involving doctors, migrant patients and ‘intercultural mediators’ who provide interpreting services. Our study is based on a collection of 300 interactions involving two language pairs, Arabic–Italian and English–Italian. The analytical framework includes conversation analysis combined with insights from social systems theory. We look at question-answer sequences, where (1) the doctors ask questions about patients’ problems or history, (2) the doctors’ questions are responded to and (3) the doctor closes the sequence, moving on to another question. We analyse the ways in which mediators help doctors design questions for patients and patients understand and eventually respond to the doctors’ design. While the doctor’s question design aims at obtaining details which are relevant for the patients’ care, it is argued that collecting such details involves complex interactional work. In particular, doctors need help in displaying their attention to their patients’ problems and in guiding patients’ responses into medically relevant directions. Likewise, patients need help in reacting appropriately. Mediators help manage communicative uncertainty both by showing the doctor’s interest in what the patient says, and by exploring and rendering the patient’s incomplete, extended and ambiguous answers to the doctor’s questions.

Download Full-text