A Novel Approach to Ship Operational Risk Analysis Based on D-S Evidence Theory

2021 ◽  
pp. 728-741
Author(s):  
Tao Liu ◽  
Yuanzi Zhou ◽  
Junzhong Bao ◽  
Xizhao Wang ◽  
Pengfei Zhang
Author(s):  
Ikuobase Emovon ◽  
Rosemary A. Norman ◽  
Alan J. Murphy

Failure Mode Effect and Analysis (FMEA) is one of the most powerful techniques for performing risk analysis for marine machinery systems, with risk being quantified through evaluating Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for all failure modes of the systems. The RPN is traditionally evaluated as the product of three risk criteria; occurrence (O), severity (S) and Detection (D). FMEA has several limitations such as the challenge of aggregating experts’ risk criteria rating that may be imprecise or incomplete. In this paper some of the limitations in the conventional FMEA technique are addressed using two approaches; AVeraging technique integrated with conventional Risk Priority Number (AVRPN) and AVeraging technique integrated with TOPSIS (AVTOPSIS). Both proposed techniques use a novel approach simple average in aggregating imprecise experts’ risk criteria ratings. A case study illustrates the suitability of both techniques for use in risk prioritisation jointly or independently as the results generated by both techniques are very similar. Furthermore, the AVRPN technique has been applied to an example from the literature and it has been demonstrated to be both computationally simple and capable of producing results which almost completely match those generated by modified Dempster-Shafer evidence theory techniques.


2018 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 485-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Khan ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Brian Veitch ◽  
Ming Yang

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyuan Li ◽  
Mingjun Jiang ◽  
Haiming Ge ◽  
Zhen Li ◽  
Dongkun Luo

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Chang ◽  
Raul Valverde ◽  
Muthu Ramachandran ◽  
Chung-Sheng Li

Financialization has contributed to economic growth but has caused scandals, misselling, rogue trading, tax evasion, and market speculation. To a certain extent, it has also created problems in social and economic instability. It is an important aspect of Enterprise Security, Privacy, and Risk (ESPR), particularly in risk research and analysis. In order to minimize the damaging impacts caused by the lack of regulatory compliance, governance, ethical responsibilities, and trust, we propose a Business Integrity Modeling and Analysis (BIMA) framework to unify business integrity with performance using big data predictive analytics and business intelligence. Comprehensive services include modeling risk and asset prices, and consequently, aligning them with business strategies, making our services, according to market trend analysis, both transparent and fair. The BIMA framework uses Monte Carlo simulation, the Black–Scholes–Merton model, and the Heston model for performing financial, operational, and liquidity risk analysis and present outputs in the form of analytics and visualization. Our results and analysis demonstrate supplier bankruptcy modeling, risk pricing, high-frequency pricing simulations, London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rate simulation, and speculation detection results to provide a variety of critical risk analysis. Our approaches to tackle problems caused by financial services and the operational risk clearly demonstrate that the BIMA framework, as the outputs of our data analytics research, can effectively combine integrity and risk analysis together with overall business performance and can contribute to operational risk research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
pp. abs259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi Kruuse-Meyer ◽  
Anders Bergsli ◽  
Anders Rudberg ◽  
Helene Østbøll

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-45
Author(s):  
Sinisa Dostic ◽  
Darko Markovic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document