Orbital Decompression: Approaches to the Orbit and Surgical Planning

2020 ◽  
pp. 111-126
Author(s):  
Milind N. Naik
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sodian ◽  
G. Juchem ◽  
S. Weber ◽  
N. Gerber ◽  
N. Khaladj ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Othman ◽  
Sam Evans ◽  
Daniel Morris ◽  
Saty Bhatia ◽  
Caroline Hayhurst

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Wu ◽  
Wenya Bi ◽  
Michael Moooney ◽  
Jeffrey Guennette ◽  
Raymond Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Flores ◽  
Adam Zanation ◽  
Brian Thorp ◽  
Carolyn Quinsey

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (11) ◽  
pp. 407-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csaba Kunos ◽  
Gusztáv Gulyás ◽  
Pál Pesthy ◽  
Eszter Kovács ◽  
Zoltán Mátrai

Volume measurment of the breast allows for better surgical planning and implant selection in breast reconstructive and symmetrization procedures. The safety and accuracy of tumor removal, in accordance with oncoplastic principles, may be imporved by knowing the true breast- and breast tumor volume. The authors discuss the methods of volume measurement of the breast and describe the method based on magnetic resonance imaging digital volume measurment in details. The volume of the breast parenchyma and the tumor was determined by processing the diagnostic magnetic resonance scans, and the difference in the volume of the two breasts was measured. Surgery was planned and implant selection was made based on the measured volume details. The authors conclude that digital volume measurement proved to be a valuable tool in preoperative planning of volume reducing mammaplasty, replacement of unknown size implants and in cases when breast asymmetry is treated. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(11), 407–413.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
R.P. Roncevic ◽  
◽  
Z. Savkovic ◽  
R.T. Nigmatullin ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M Mazhar Celikoyar ◽  
Michael F Perez ◽  
M Ilhan Akbas ◽  
Oguzhan Topsakal

Abstract Background Facial features and measurements are utilized to analyze patients’ faces for various reasons, including surgical planning, scientific communications, patient-surgeon communications, and post-surgery evaluations. Objectives There are numerous descriptions regarding these features and measurements scattered throughout the literature and we did not encounter a current compilation of these parameters in the medical literature. Methods A narrative literature review of the published medical literature for facial measurements used for facial analysis in rhinoplasty was done through the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar, along with a citation search. Results A total of 61 facial features were identified. 45 points (25 bilateral, 20 unilateral), five lines (three bilateral, two unilateral), eight planes, and three areas. A total of 122 measurements were identified: 48 distances (6 bilateral, 42 unilateral), 57 angles (13 bilateral, 44 unilateral), and 17 ratios. Supplemental Figures were created to depict all features and measurements using either a frontal, lateral or basal view of the face. Conclusions This paper provides the most comprehensive and current compilation of facial measurements to date. We believe this compilation will guide further developments (methodologies and software tools) for analyzing nasal structures and assessing the objective outcomes of facial surgeries, in particular rhinoplasty. Moreover, it will improve the communication as a reference for facial measurements of facial surface anthropometry, in particular rhinoplasty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document