Reflex responses of motor units in human masseter muscle to mechanical stimulation of a tooth

1994 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
KemalS. T�rker ◽  
P�l Brodin ◽  
TimothyS. Miles
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Masseter Muscle ◽  
Motor Units ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Stimulation Of

Jaw Reflexes Evoked by Mechanical Stimulation of Teeth in Humans

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2156-2163 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yang ◽  
K. S. Türker
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Masseter Muscle ◽  
Response Pattern ◽  
Bite Force ◽  
Reflex Response ◽  
Incisor Tooth ◽  
Jaw Muscles ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Closing Force ◽  
Stimulation Of

Jaw reflexes evoked by mechanical stimulation of teeth in humans. The reflex response of jaw muscles to mechanical stimulation of an upper incisor tooth was investigated using the surface electromyogram (SEMG) of the masseter muscle and the bite force. With a slowly rising stimulus, the reflex response obtained on the masseter SEMG showed three different patterns of reflex responses; sole excitation, sole inhibition, and inhibition followed by excitation. Simultaneously recorded bite force, however, exhibited mainly one reflex response pattern, a decrease followed by an increase in the net closing force. A rapidly rising stimulus also induced several different patterns of reflex responses in the masseter SEMG. When the simultaneously recorded bite force was analyzed, however, there was only one reflex response pattern, a decrease in the net closing force. Therefore, the reflex change in the masseter muscle is not a good representative of the net reflex response of all jaw muscles to mechanical tooth stimulation. The net response is best expressed by the averaged bite force. The averaged bite force records showed that when the stimulus force was developing rapidly, the periodontal reflex could reduce the bite force and hence protect the teeth and supporting tissues from damaging forces. It also can increase the bite force; this might help keep food between the teeth if the change in force rate is slow, especially when the initial bite force is low.

Reflex responses in active muscles elicited by stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the human foot

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 1375-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Aniss ◽  
S. C. Gandevia ◽  
D. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Motor Units ◽  
Medial Gastrocnemius ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Single Motor ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Posterior Tibial ◽  
Single Motor Units ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Reflex responses were elicited in muscles that act at the ankle by electrical stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the foot in human subjects who were reclining supine. During steady voluntary contractions, stimulus trains (5 pulses at 300 Hz) were delivered at two intensities to the sural nerve (1.2-4.0 times sensory threshold) or to the posterior tibial nerve (1.1-3.0 times motor threshold for the intrinsic muscles of the foot). Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made from tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), soleus (SOL), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles by the use of intramuscular wire electrodes. 2. As assessed by averages of rectified EMG, stimulation of the sural or posterior tibial nerves at nonpainful levels evoked a complex oscillation with onset latencies as early as 40 ms and lasting up to 200 ms in each muscle. The most common initial responses in TA were a decrease in EMG activity at an onset latency of 54 ms for sural stimuli, and an increase at an onset latency of 49 ms for posterior tibial stimuli. The response of PL to stimulation of the two nerves began with a strong facilitation of 44 ms (sural) and 49 ms (posterior tibial). With SOL, stimulation of both nerves produced early inhibition beginning at 45 and 50 ms, respectively. With both LG and MG, sural stimuli produced an early facilitation at 52-53 ms. However, posterior tibial stimuli produced different initial responses in these two muscles: facilitation in LG at 50 ms and inhibition in MG at 51 ms. 3. Perstimulus time histograms of the discharge of 61 single motor units revealed generally similar reflex responses as in multiunit EMG. However, different reflex components were not equally apparent in the responses of different single motor units: an individual motor unit could respond slightly differently with a change in stimulus intensity or background contraction level. The multiunit EMG record represents a global average that does not necessarily depict the precise pattern of all motor units contributing to the average. 4. When subjects stood erect without support and with eyes closed, reflex patterns were seen only in active muscles, and the patterns were similar to those in the reclining posture. 5. It is concluded that afferents from mechanoreceptors in the sole of the foot have multisynaptic reflex connections with the motoneuron pools innervating the muscles that act at the ankle. When the muscles are active in standing or walking, cutaneous feedback may play a role in modulating motoneuron output and thereby contribute to stabilization of stance and gait.

Viscero-sympathetic reflex responses to mechanical stimulation of pelvic viscera in the cat

1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-J. Häbler ◽  
K. Hilbers ◽  
W. Jänig ◽  
M. Koltzenburg ◽  
H. Kümmel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Pelvic Viscera ◽  
Stimulation Of

Recruitment of triceps surae motor units in the decerebrate cat. II. Heterogeneity among soleus motor units

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 2005-2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Sokoloff ◽  
T. C. Cope
Keyword(s):  
Motor Unit ◽  
Soleus Muscle ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Muscle Force ◽  
Motor Units ◽  
The Other ◽  
Physiological Properties ◽  
Spike Number ◽  
Active Motor ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. On the basis of the orderly activation of motoneurons in a pool, one would predict that motor unit activity and whole muscle force will change at least roughly in parallel: active motor units should continue to fire as net muscle force increases and quiescent motor units should remain inactive as muscle force decreases. We have consistently observed this relationship in our studies of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscle, but here we report an uncoupling of the soleus muscle and some of its motor units. 2. Physiological properties and firing behaviors of 20 soleus motor units were characterized in five decerebrate cats with the use of intra-axonal stimulation and recording. Motor unit firing was elicited in reflexes initiated by muscle stretch, nerve stimulation, and mechanical stimulation of the heel. Particular emphasis was placed on the heterogenic reflexes produced in soleus by ramphold-release stretches of the MG muscle. In agreement with previous reports, either net heterogenic excitation or inhibition of the soleus muscle was produced in separate trials of MG stretch. 3. During excitation of soleus in autogenic stretch reflexes and in crossed-extension reflexes, all 20 units were recruited or increased firing, i.e., unit firing was coupled with soleus force. In the other reflexes, however, unit firing and muscle force were uncoupled for 10 of these units. Six tonically active motor units were inhibited during an increase in soleus force produced by MG stretch or by mechanical stimulation of the heel. Four motor units were activated during a decrease in soleus force produced by the same stimuli. 4. Six motor units were studied during both soleus inhibition and excitation evoked by MG stretches. One motor unit was consistently coupled to the soleus muscle response; firing increased during soleus excitation and decreased during inhibition. However, four soleus motor units were inhibited under both conditions, and one unit was excited under both conditions. Thus the firing behavior of five of these six motor units was the same in response to MG stretch, irrespective of the soleus response. 5. The uncoupling was most clearly recognized when tonically active units ceased firing during net excitation of the soleus muscle and when silent units began firing during net inhibition of the soleus muscle. Unit responses were not as striking in all trials of MG stretch (spike number increased or decreased relative to prestretch values by 1-4 spikes), but the responses were consistent across trials; in multiple stretches, spike number commonly either increased or decreased. Intertrial regularity was also observed in units for which firing was coupled with the net reflex response of the soleus muscle. 6. Divergence in the firing of soleus motor units was also observed in three cases in which records were taken simultaneously from two motor units. In one pair, one unit increased and the other decreased firing during MG stretch-evoked inhibition of soleus. In the other two pairs, one unit increased and the other decreased firing when soleus was excited by heel stimulation. In all pairs, the unit that decreased firing under these conditions had the lowest recruitment threshold in response to the soleus stretch. 7. Although all soleus motor units were classified as slow-twitch (type S), variation in their physiological properties bore some relation to firing behavior. Those units recruited during periods of soleus inhibition exhibited among the fastest conduction velocities and contraction times in our sample. In all three unit pairs sampled, the unit expressing decreases in firing had the slower conduction velocity and contraction time. 8. These findings demonstrate that soleus motor units are differentially activated and deactivated by peripheral afferents. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

scholarly journals Physiological recruitment of motor units by high-frequency electrical stimulation of afferent pathways

2015 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob L. Dideriksen ◽  
Silvia Muceli ◽  
Strahinja Dosen ◽  
Christopher M. Laine ◽  
Dario Farina
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Unit ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Motor Units ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Motor Unit Recruitment ◽  
Afferent Stimulation ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Stimulation Of

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is commonly used in rehabilitation, but electrically evoked muscle activation is in several ways different from voluntary muscle contractions. These differences lead to challenges in the use of NMES for restoring muscle function. We investigated the use of low-current, high-frequency nerve stimulation to activate the muscle via the spinal motoneuron (MN) pool to achieve more natural activation patterns. Using a novel stimulation protocol, the H-reflex responses to individual stimuli in a train of stimulation pulses at 100 Hz were reliably estimated with surface EMG during low-level contractions. Furthermore, single motor unit recruitment by afferent stimulation was analyzed with intramuscular EMG. The results showed that substantially elevated H-reflex responses were obtained during 100-Hz stimulation with respect to a lower stimulation frequency. Furthermore, motor unit recruitment using 100-Hz stimulation was not fully synchronized, as it occurs in classic NMES, and the discharge rates differed among motor units because each unit was activated only after a specific number of stimuli. The most likely mechanism behind these observations is the temporal summation of subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials from Ia fibers to the MNs. These findings and their interpretation were also verified by a realistic simulation model of afferent stimulation of a MN population. These results suggest that the proposed stimulation strategy may allow generation of considerable levels of muscle activation by motor unit recruitment that resembles the physiological conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document