Chromosome organisation in the Australian plague locust, Chortoicetes terminifera

Chromosoma ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Webb
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Mangeon ◽  
Allan Spessa ◽  
Edward Deveson ◽  
Ross Darnell ◽  
Darren J. Kriticos

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
ShangXian Zhou ◽  
James D. Woodman ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Paul D. Cooper

The role of the foregut (crop and proventriculus) in mechanical processing of food has received little attention in insects. Using the Australian plague locust (Chortoicetes terminifera) and the black field cricket (Teleogryllus commodus) as models, the role of the crop in processing of wheat or rye grass was examined. Interior cuticular structures (spines) of the foregut were described using light and scanning electron microscopy, with locusts having sclerotised structures and crops of crickets being unsclerotised internally. Muscular bands on the exterior surface of the crop part of the foregut are similar in males of both species, but contractions and movements are more forceful in locusts. Passage rate from the foregut is much faster in locusts (<3 h) than in crickets (>3 h). Water within the crop is reduced compared with the water content of fresh grass within the foregut of locusts, but water is increased in cricket crops. Spines within the crops are small relative to the size of food particles in both species. Some spines of locusts contain metals. The slower passage rate from the crop of crickets may be limited by the proventriculus. Foregut structure and food processing facilitates the generalist diet of crickets, but may restrict locusts to consuming softer grasses.


1997 ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Milner ◽  
G. L. Baker ◽  
G. H. S. Hooper ◽  
C. Prior

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Penfold

During the cell-cycle and meiosis, during development, or in response to stress, chromosomes undertake dramatic programs of reorganisation, which can result in major changes to genomic architecture, as well as local changes to chromatin structure via chromatin remodelling and epigenetic modification. The biophysical properties of the genome may therefore vary significantly over time, from region to region, and from cell to cell. Semifleixble polymer models are frequently used to decipher the spatial and temporal aspects of chromosome organisation. Such models allow for parameter estimation from experimental observations (Bystricky et al., 2004, Ding et al., 2006, Koszul et al., 2008, Arbona et al., 2017), and so provide a concise quantification of the state of the system in terms of meaningful biophysical parameters, such as the compaction factor and bending-modulus. Simulation studies using appropriately parameterised models may also provide novel insights, and allow for predictions without confounding pleiotropic effects (Penfold et al., 2012), thus guiding future studies. Most semifleixble polymer models do not explicitly consider the spatial non-stationarity of chromosomes and chromatin. Furthermore, recent advances in chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based allow chromosome organisation to be (indirectly) measured in single cells (Belton et al., 2012, Nagano et al., 2013, 2016). The increasing availability of ensembles of trajectories sampled from potentially heterogeneous populations of cells means it is of interest to develop polymer statistic models that can capture both the spatial nonstationarity of the biophysical parameters, and the statistical relationships that exist within the population. Here we outline a statistical framework for non-stationary semiflexible polymers, and demonstrate how inference can be performed using ensembles of trajectories. For cells belonging to a homogenous population where the biophysical parameters are approximately identical in all cells, a (transformed) Gaussian process prior is assigned to the bending-modulus, and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) used to infer the posterior distribution of free parameters. For heterogeneous populations of cells, a transformed hierarchical GP (HGP) prior is assigned to the biophysical parameters, which naturally captures the statistical dependency of the parameters that exist across the population. Simulation studies demonstrate the accuracy of the model for homogenous and heterogeneous populations, while applications to yeast chromosome data demonstrates an improved ability to recapitulate trajectories of held out loci compared to related stationary models.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma L. M. Fisher ◽  
Jani R. Bolla ◽  
Karthik V. Rajasekar ◽  
Jarno Mäkelä ◽  
Rachel Baker ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTSMC complexes have ubiquitous roles in chromosome organisation. In Escherichia coli, the interplay between the SMC complex, MukBEF, and matS-bound MatP in the replication termination region, ter, results in depletion of MukBEF from ter, thus promoting chromosome individualisation by directing replichores to separate cell halves. MukBEF also interacts with topoisomerase IV ParC2E2 heterotetramers, to direct its chromosomal distribution to mirror that of MukBEF, thereby facilitating coordination between chromosome organisation and decatenation by topoisomerase IV. Here we demonstrate that the MukB dimerization hinge binds ParC and MatP with the same dimer to dimer stoichiometry. MatP and ParC have an overlapping binding interface on the MukB hinge, leading to their mutually exclusive binding. Furthermore, the MukB hinge fails to stably associate with matS-bound MatP, while MatP mutants deficient in matS binding are impaired in MukB hinge binding, demonstrating that mats competes with the hinge for MatP binding. Cells expressing MukBEF complexes containing a mutation in the MukB hinge interface for ParC/MatP binding are deficient in ParC binding in vivo, despite having a Muk+ topoisomerase IV+ phenotype. This mutant protein is also impaired in MatP binding in vitro, and cells expressing this variant exhibit a MukBEF cellular localisation consistent with impaired MatP binding.


2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. A. Eidelman ◽  
S. G. Andreev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document