Consensus Statement from the International Workshop on Types of Diabetes Peculiar to the Tropics, 17–19 October 1995, in Cuttack, India

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Hoet ◽  
B. B. Tripathy
2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R Clemmons

Abstract Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) measurements are widely used in the diagnosis of disorders of GH secretion, evaluation of children with short stature from multiple causes, management of disorders that lead to nutritional insufficiency or catabolism, and monitoring both GH and IGF-I replacement therapy. Therefore, there is an ongoing need for accurate and precise measurements of these 2 peptide hormones. Representatives of the Growth Hormone Research Society, the IGF Society, and the IFCC convened an international workshop to review assay standardization, requirements for improving assay comparability, variables that affect assay interpretation, technical factors affecting assay performance, assay validation criteria, and the development and use of normative data. Special attention was given to preanalytical conditions, the use of international commutable reference standards, antibody specificity, matrix requirements, QC analysis, and interference by binding proteins. Recommendations for each of these variables were made for measurements of each peptide. Additionally, specific criteria for IGF-I were recommended for age ranges of normative data, consideration of Tanner staging, and consideration of the effect of body mass index. The consensus statement concludes that major improvements are necessary in the areas of assay performance and comparability. This group recommends that a commutable standard for each assay be implemented for worldwide use and that its recommendations be applied to accomplish the task of providing reliable and clinically useful results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo A.C. Denier van der Gon ◽  
Miriam E. Gerlofs-Nijland ◽  
Robert Gehrig ◽  
Mats Gustafsson ◽  
Nicole Janssen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1627-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitri Baranov ◽  
Philip E. Bickler ◽  
Gregory J. Crosby ◽  
Deborah J. Culley ◽  
Maryellen F. Eckenhoff ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas. R Latimer ◽  
Daniel Pollard ◽  
Adrian Towse ◽  
Chris Henshall ◽  
Lloyd Sansom ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is increasingly common for two or more treatments for cancer to be combined as a single regimen. Determining value and appropriate payment for such regimens can be challenging. This study discusses these challenges, and possible solutions. Methods Stakeholders from around the world attended a 2-day workshop, supported by a background paper. This study captures key outcomes from the discussion, but is not a consensus statement. Results Workshop attendees agreed that combining on-patent treatments can result in affordability and value for money challenges that delay or deny patient access to clinically effective treatments in many health systems. Options for addressing these challenges include: (i) Increasing the value of combination therapies through improved clinical development; (ii) Willingness to pay more for combinations than for single drugs offering similar benefit, or; (iii) Aligning the cost of constituent therapies with their value within a regimen. Workshop attendees felt that (i) and (iii) merited further discussion, whereas (ii) was unlikely to be justifiable. Views differed on the feasibility of (i). Key to (iii) would be systems allowing different prices to apply to different uses of a drug. Conclusions Common ground was identified on immediate actions to improve access to combination regimens. These include an exploration of the legal challenges associated with price negotiations, and ensuring that pricing systems can support implementation of negotiated prices for specific uses. Improvements to clinical development and trial design should be pursued in the medium and longer term.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document