Application of sex attractants for monitoring the pea moth,Cydia nigricana (F.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1857-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wall



1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Greenway ◽  
C. Wall ◽  
J. N. Perry




1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 973-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Greenway


1981 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1049-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Greenway ◽  
S. A. Davis ◽  
M. C. Smith


2010 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Thöming ◽  
H. Saucke

AbstractThe hypothesis that spring emergence of the pea moth Cydia nigricana is regulated by environmental factors, particularly photoperiod and temperature, was examined in this study. A long-term field study was conducted in two distinct pea-growing areas in Hesse and Saxony, Germany. Strong correlations between the flight phenology of pea moth in spring and air temperature, soil temperature, solar radiation and day length were demonstrated for three consecutive years. In laboratory experiments, we elucidated the interaction of different photoperiod-temperature regimes, verifying cumulative day-degree data in relation to pea moth emergence rates in the field. C. nigricana temperature sensitivity is apparently initiated by long day conditions with a critical day length of about 14 h L:D. The overall results contribute to the theory that photoperiod and temperature interact as regulatory cues for spring emergence of C. nigricana. The findings are discussed in terms of the development of predictive models and decision support systems for pea moth control.



1977 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. M. MACAULAY ◽  
T. LEWIS
Keyword(s):  
Pea Moth ◽  


1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.D.M. Macaulay ◽  
P. Etheridge ◽  
D.G. Garthwaite ◽  
A.R. Greenway ◽  
C. Wall ◽  
...  


1938 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewen Cameron

1. The moth—Cydia nigricana—whose larvae bore into the pods of developing peas and render most of the contained seeds unfit for human consumption is considered by some authorities to be one of the principal insect pests of agriculture in Canada. It is particularly destructive in the Maritime Provinces and British Columbia, while in Ontario it increased to such proportions that the farmers of that province had to give up growing mid-season peas altogether.2. This state of affairs is attributed to the fact that the pea moth was accidentally introduced from Europe in 1893 without the insect parasites which attack and check it in its native home. At any rate no parasites have emerged from the representative collections of pea moth material made by the Canadian entomologists in the affected areas, while three species with a combined parasitism of up to 60 per cent. have been reared by the writer from cocoons of the moth in England. Furthermore, in Canada, where parasites of this particular pest are absent, 10–50 per cent. of the pea crop and sometimes as much as 75 per cent. or more, is said to be destroyed annually by the moth larvae, whereas in England, where they are present, the attack is usually comparatively slight.3. The paper opens with a general account of the biology of the pea moth including systematic descriptions of the adult and developmental stages, and notes on the host-plants and distribution of the insect.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document