New-firm startups, technology, and macroeconomic fluctuations

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Audretsch ◽  
Zoltan J. Acs
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 1550019 ◽  
Author(s):  
BOSTJAN ANTONCIC ◽  
JASNA AUER ANTONCIC ◽  
MATJAZ GANTAR ◽  
ZHAOYANG LI ◽  
MARJA-LIISA KAKKONEN

The personality of entrepreneurs can have a large influence on entrepreneurial startups. The general locus of control, which is an element of the personality of entrepreneurs, is considered to be critical for the creation of entrepreneurial startups. Despite the generally acknowledged importance of one’s locus of control for entrepreneurial intentions and new firm startups, a research gap exists because less emphasis has been given to external locus of control, in particular chance control. Chance non-control can be defined as a person’s disbelief in chance- or luck-based outcomes. In this study, a country-moderated hypothesis about the relationship between a person’s chance non-control and his or her entrepreneurship (activities or intentions) was developed and empirically tested by using data collected through a structured questionnaire from 645 students in three countries (China, Finland and Slovenia). Regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis. Based on the findings, which are partially in support of the moderated hypothesis, recommendations for research and practice are proposed. The key contribution of the study is the explanation of the role of chance non-control in entrepreneurship and the notion the relationship between chance non-control and entrepreneurship tends to be moderated depending on uncertainty avoidance.


Empirica ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Audretsch ◽  
Marco Vivarelli
Keyword(s):  
New Firm ◽  

1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (4II) ◽  
pp. 1073-1087
Author(s):  
Rizwan Thair

Providing a reasonable explanation for the business cycle has been the research agenda for many economists since the early 20th century, from Mitchell (1913), Pigou (1927) and Adelman and Adelman (1959) to Lucas (1972), Black (1982) and King and Plosser (1984). For a review, see Zarnowitz (1985). Most attempts to explain the sources of macroeconomic fluctuations' attribute the variability in output and prices to only a few sources, sometimes to\mJ.y one. Kydland and Prescott (1982) and others proposed technology shocks as the main source of aggregate variability; Barro (1977) pointed to unanticipated changes in money stock; Lilien (1982) argued for 'unusual structural shifts' such as changes in the demand for goods relative to services, and Hamilton (1983) concluded in favour of oil price shocks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document