A decision table and rule based interpretation system for epileptic discharges

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Mishra

1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
M. Simaan


1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
M . Simaan




2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Huysmans ◽  
Karel Dejaeger ◽  
Christophe Mues ◽  
Jan Vanthienen ◽  
Bart Baesens




2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (06) ◽  
pp. 1107-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRZEGORZ J. NALEPA ◽  
ANTONI LIGĘZA ◽  
KRZYSZTOF KACZOR

The paper discusses a new knowledge representation for rule-based systems called XTT2. It combines decision trees and decision tables forming a transparent and hierarchical visual representation of the decision units linked into a workflow-like structure. There are two levels of abstraction in the XTT2 model: the lower level, where a single knowledge component defined by a set of rules working in the same context is represented by a single decision table, and the higher level, where the structure of the whole knowledge base is considered. This model has a concise formalization which opens up possibility of well-defined, structured design and verification of formal characteristics. Based on the visual XTT2 model, a textual representation of the rule base is generated. A dedicated engine provides a unified run-time environment for the XTT2 rule bases. The focus of the paper is on the formalization of the presented approach. It is based on the so-called ALSV(FD) logic that provides an expressive calculus for rules.



2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1669-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon van Middelkoop ◽  
Aloys W J Borgers ◽  
H J P Timmermans

The authors report on the development and test of a rule-based model of tourist destination choice, using decision tables to represent the rules that specify the conditions under which particular destination choices are made. Rules are extracted from empirical data on tourist destination choice, collected in the Netherlands in 1998. The specification of the model and its performance are discussed.



1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela G. Garn-Nunn ◽  
Vicki Martin

This study explored whether or not standard administration and scoring of conventional articulation tests accurately identified children as phonologically disordered and whether or not information from these tests established severity level and programming needs. Results of standard scoring procedures from the Assessment of Phonological Processes-Revised, the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation, the Photo Articulation Test, and the Weiss Comprehensive Articulation Test were compared for 20 phonologically impaired children. All tests identified the children as phonologically delayed/disordered, but the conventional tests failed to clearly and consistently differentiate varying severity levels. Conventional test results also showed limitations in error sensitivity, ease of computation for scoring procedures, and implications for remediation programming. The use of some type of rule-based analysis for phonologically impaired children is highly recommended.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document