Mixed curvature measures for sets of positive reach and a translative integral formula

1995 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rataj ◽  
M. Z�hle
1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Rataj

Let X, Y be two sets of positive reach in ℝd. The translative integral formula says that, for 0 ≦ k ≦ d − 1 and bounded Borel subsets A, B ε ℝd, where is the curvature measure (of order k) of X and is the mixed curvature measure of the sets X, Y and order r, S [1]. The mixed curvature measures are introduced by means of rectifiable currents, which leads to a relatively simple proof of (1). The proof needs an additional assumption on X, Y assuring that also reach (X ∩ Yz) > 0 for almost all z. This assumption is satisfied automatically for convex bodies, in dimension 2, or for sets with a sufficiently smooth boundary. Using the additivity of mixed curvature measures, (1) can be extended to unions of sets of positive reach.


1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Jan Rataj

Let X, Y be two sets of positive reach in ℝ d . The translative integral formula says that, for 0 ≦ k ≦ d − 1 and bounded Borel subsets A, B ε ℝ d , where is the curvature measure (of order k) of X and is the mixed curvature measure of the sets X, Y and order r, S [1]. The mixed curvature measures are introduced by means of rectifiable currents, which leads to a relatively simple proof of (1). The proof needs an additional assumption on X, Y assuring that also reach (X ∩ Yz ) > 0 for almost all z. This assumption is satisfied automatically for convex bodies, in dimension 2, or for sets with a sufficiently smooth boundary. Using the additivity of mixed curvature measures, (1) can be extended to unions of sets of positive reach.


1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Esling ◽  
Jacques Muller ◽  
Hans-Joachim Bunge
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (08) ◽  
pp. 1219-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. KHARCHEV ◽  
A. MARSHAKOV

We study the role of integral representations in the description of nonperturbative solutions to c ≤ 1 string theory. A generic solution is determined by two functions, W(x) and Q(x), which behave at infinity like xp and xq respectively. The integral formula for arbitrary (p, q) models is derived, which explicitly realizes a duality transformation between (p, q) and (q, p) 2D gravity solutions. We also discuss the exact solutions to the string equation and reduction condition and present several explicit examples.


2020 ◽  
pp. 108128652097275
Author(s):  
Miroslav Šilhavý

The paper presents a coordinate-free analysis of deformation measures for shells modeled as 2D surfaces. These measures are represented by second-order tensors. As is well-known, two types are needed in general: the surface strain measure (deformations in tangential directions), and the bending strain measure (warping). Our approach first determines the 3D strain tensor E of a shear deformation of a 3D shell-like body and then linearizes E in two smallness parameters: the displacement and the distance of a point from the middle surface. The linearized expression is an affine function of the signed distance from the middle surface: the absolute term is the surface strain measure and the coefficient of the linear term is the bending strain measure. The main result of the paper determines these two tensors explicitly for general shear deformations and for the subcase of Kirchhoff-Love deformations. The derived surface strain measures are the classical ones: Naghdi’s surface strain measure generally and its well-known particular case for the Kirchhoff-Love deformations. With the bending strain measures comes a surprise: they are different from the traditional ones. For shear deformations our analysis provides a new tensor [Formula: see text], which is different from the widely used Naghdi’s bending strain tensor [Formula: see text]. In the particular case of Kirchhoff–Love deformations, the tensor [Formula: see text] reduces to a tensor [Formula: see text] introduced earlier by Anicic and Léger (Formulation bidimensionnelle exacte du modéle de coque 3D de Kirchhoff–Love. C R Acad Sci Paris I 1999; 329: 741–746). Again, [Formula: see text] is different from Koiter’s bending strain tensor [Formula: see text] (frequently used in this context). AMS 2010 classification: 74B99


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132
Author(s):  
D. Zhao ◽  
Z. Gong ◽  
J. Feng

Abstract For the modelling and determination of the Earth’s external gravity potential as well as its second-order radial derivatives in the space near sea surface, the surface layer integral method was discussed in the paper. The reasons for the applicability of the method over sea surface were discussed. From the original integral formula of disturbing potential based on the surface layer method, the expression of the radial component of the gravity gradient tensor was derived. Furthermore, an identity relation was introduced to modify the formula in order to reduce the singularity problem. Numerical experiments carried out over the marine area of China show that, the modi-fied surface layer integral method effectively improves the accuracy and reliability of the calculation of the second-order radial gradient component of the disturbing potential near sea surface.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Vitali Kapovitch ◽  
Alexander Lytchak

Abstract We discuss folklore statements about distance functions in manifolds with two-sided bounded curvature. The topics include regularity, subsets of positive reach and the cut locus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document