The Early Neolithic site at Hoge Vaart, Almere, the Netherlands, with particular reference to non-diffusion of crop plants, and the significance of site function and sample location

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Brinkkemper ◽  
Willem-Jan Hogestijn ◽  
Hans Peeters ◽  
Dick Visser ◽  
Cressida Whitton
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Crop Plants ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Site ◽  
Site Function

scholarly journals Analysis of the material culture and new radiocarbon dating of the Early Neolithic site of Amnya I

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-159
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Nikolaevna Dubovtseva ◽  
Lubov Lvovna Kosinskaya ◽  
Henny Piezonka
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Western Siberia ◽  
Northern Taiga ◽  
Taiga Zone ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Site ◽  
Relative Chronology ◽  
The One ◽  
Technological Analysis ◽  
Khanty Mansi Autonomous

The ancient fortified settlement of Amnya I is a unique Early Neolithic site in the northern taiga zone of Western Siberia (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, the Amnya river). It is located on a promontory and has three lines of defense and ten dwelling depressions. The structures of the excavated dwellings are very similar, though the artifact assemblage appears rather heterogeneous. We carried out a technical and technological analysis of ceramics, which showed no correlation between the texture, on the one hand, and the morphology and ornamentation of pots on the other one. Planiographic analysis of ceramics showed that vessels with comb and incising patterns are found in different dwellings, although there are objects in which both groups lie together. Various categories of stone implements (bladelets and polished arrowheads) also appear on different parts of the settlement. Most likely, the observed differences in the artefact complexes of objects are associated with the stages of the functioning of the settlement. The absolute chronology does not yet clarify the sequence of erection and existence of objects. New AMS date is probably vulnerable to a significant reservoir effect. The abundance of unsolved issues of absolute and relative chronology makes the resumption of research on this unique site urgent.

scholarly journals Flint ‘figurines’ from the Early Neolithic site of Kharaysin, Jordan

Antiquity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (376) ◽  
pp. 880-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan José Ibáñez ◽  
Juan R. Muñiz ◽  
Thomas Huet ◽  
Jonathan Santana ◽  
Luis C. Teira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Site

Abstract

scholarly journals First lipid residue analysis of Early Neolithic pottery from Swifterbant (the Netherlands, ca. 4300–4000 BC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Özge Demirci ◽  
Alexandre Lucquin ◽  
Oliver E. Craig ◽  
Daan C.M. Raemaekers
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Residue Analysis ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Pottery

scholarly journals The Neolithic Site of Serra Cicora: Results of the AMS Radiocarbon Dating

Radiocarbon ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Quarta ◽  
M D'Elia ◽  
E Ingravallo ◽  
I Tiberi ◽  
L Calcagnile
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Radiocarbon Dating ◽  
Southern Italy ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Human Occupation ◽  
Late Neolithic ◽  
Ams Radiocarbon Dating ◽  
Neolithic Site ◽  
New Information ◽  
Definition Of

Bone and charcoal samples from the Neolithic site of Serra Cicora in the Salento Peninsula (southern Italy) have been dated by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Measurements appear to support other archaeological evidence and have shown that 2 distinct phases of human occupation of the site can be identified: the first occupation in the Early Neolithic and a second occupation in the Middle-Late Neolithic. The results provide new information and are a fundamental contribution to the definition of the absolute chronology of the Middle-Late Neolithic in this part of Europe.

Novopetrovka III—an Early Neolithic Site in the Western Amur Basin and Its Chronology

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
A. P. Derevianko ◽  
S. P. Nesterov ◽  
A. V. Tabarev ◽  
S. V. Alkin ◽  
Uchida Kazunori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amur Basin ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Site

Novopetrovka III—an Early Neolithic Site in the Western Amur Basin and Its Chronology

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
A. P. Derevianko ◽  
◽  
S. P. Nesterov ◽  
A. V. Tabarev ◽  
S. V. Alkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amur Basin ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Neolithic Site

В статье рассмотрена хронология неолитического памятника Новопетровка III в Западном Приамурье, установленная по данным радиоуглеродного датирования нагара на керамике. Новопетровская культура в целом, представленная памятниками Новопетровка I-III и Константиновка, исследованными в первой половине 1960-х гг., по результатам типологического анализа пластинчатой индустрии была отнесена к V (возможно, VI) — началу IV тыс. до н.э. Обзор данных по изготовлению призматических пластин с помощью отжимной техники показал, что хронологически пластинчатые индустрии появились на обширной территории Евразии в финале плейстоцена — начале голоцена и продолжали существовать в отдельных регионах вплоть до энеолита. Поэтому они могут служить лишь ориентиром в определении относительной хронологии памятников. С появлением в 1990-х гг. радиоуглеродных дат, полученных по органическому наполнителю в керамическом тесте и нагару на керамике с поселения Новопетровка II, новопетровская культура была удревнена до 15,5-10,8 тыс. л.н. (калиброванные значения). На основе сравнительного анализа новых радиоуглеродных дат, определенных по нагару, установлен возраст памятника Новопетровка III -9,0-9,5 тыс. лет. В связи с тем, что в археологическом материале с новопетровских поселений в рамках длительного периода изменений не выявлено, обозначена проблема хронологической оценки как новопетровской культуры в целом, так и ее отдельных памятников.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document