Novopetrovka III—an Early Neolithic Site in the Western Amur Basin and Its Chronology

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
A. P. Derevianko ◽  
S. P. Nesterov ◽  
A. V. Tabarev ◽  
S. V. Alkin ◽  
Uchida Kazunori ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
A. P. Derevianko ◽  
◽  
S. P. Nesterov ◽  
A. V. Tabarev ◽  
S. V. Alkin ◽  
...  

В статье рассмотрена хронология неолитического памятника Новопетровка III в Западном Приамурье, установленная по данным радиоуглеродного датирования нагара на керамике. Новопетровская культура в целом, представленная памятниками Новопетровка I-III и Константиновка, исследованными в первой половине 1960-х гг., по результатам типологического анализа пластинчатой индустрии была отнесена к V (возможно, VI) — началу IV тыс. до н.э. Обзор данных по изготовлению призматических пластин с помощью отжимной техники показал, что хронологически пластинчатые индустрии появились на обширной территории Евразии в финале плейстоцена — начале голоцена и продолжали существовать в отдельных регионах вплоть до энеолита. Поэтому они могут служить лишь ориентиром в определении относительной хронологии памятников. С появлением в 1990-х гг. радиоуглеродных дат, полученных по органическому наполнителю в керамическом тесте и нагару на керамике с поселения Новопетровка II, новопетровская культура была удревнена до 15,5-10,8 тыс. л.н. (калиброванные значения). На основе сравнительного анализа новых радиоуглеродных дат, определенных по нагару, установлен возраст памятника Новопетровка III -9,0-9,5 тыс. лет. В связи с тем, что в археологическом материале с новопетровских поселений в рамках длительного периода изменений не выявлено, обозначена проблема хронологической оценки как новопетровской культуры в целом, так и ее отдельных памятников.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-159
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Nikolaevna Dubovtseva ◽  
Lubov Lvovna Kosinskaya ◽  
Henny Piezonka

The ancient fortified settlement of Amnya I is a unique Early Neolithic site in the northern taiga zone of Western Siberia (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, the Amnya river). It is located on a promontory and has three lines of defense and ten dwelling depressions. The structures of the excavated dwellings are very similar, though the artifact assemblage appears rather heterogeneous. We carried out a technical and technological analysis of ceramics, which showed no correlation between the texture, on the one hand, and the morphology and ornamentation of pots on the other one. Planiographic analysis of ceramics showed that vessels with comb and incising patterns are found in different dwellings, although there are objects in which both groups lie together. Various categories of stone implements (bladelets and polished arrowheads) also appear on different parts of the settlement. Most likely, the observed differences in the artefact complexes of objects are associated with the stages of the functioning of the settlement. The absolute chronology does not yet clarify the sequence of erection and existence of objects. New AMS date is probably vulnerable to a significant reservoir effect. The abundance of unsolved issues of absolute and relative chronology makes the resumption of research on this unique site urgent.


Antiquity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (376) ◽  
pp. 880-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan José Ibáñez ◽  
Juan R. Muñiz ◽  
Thomas Huet ◽  
Jonathan Santana ◽  
Luis C. Teira ◽  
...  

Abstract


Radiocarbon ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Quarta ◽  
M D'Elia ◽  
E Ingravallo ◽  
I Tiberi ◽  
L Calcagnile

Bone and charcoal samples from the Neolithic site of Serra Cicora in the Salento Peninsula (southern Italy) have been dated by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Measurements appear to support other archaeological evidence and have shown that 2 distinct phases of human occupation of the site can be identified: the first occupation in the Early Neolithic and a second occupation in the Middle-Late Neolithic. The results provide new information and are a fundamental contribution to the definition of the absolute chronology of the Middle-Late Neolithic in this part of Europe.


Author(s):  
E. S. Malinverni ◽  
C. Conati Barbaro ◽  
R. Pierdicca ◽  
C. A. Bozzi ◽  
A. N. Tassetti

The huge potential of 3D digital acquisition techniques for the documentation of archaeological sites, as well as the related findings, is almost well established. In spite of the variety of available techniques, a sole documentation pipeline cannot be defined a priori because of the diversity of archaeological settings. Stratigraphic archaeological excavations, for example, require a systematic, quick and low cost 3D single-surface documentation because the nature of stratigraphic archaeology compels providing documentary evidence of any excavation phase. Only within a destructive process each single excavation cannot be identified, documented and interpreted and this implies the necessity of a re- examination of the work on field. In this context, this paper describes the methodology, carried out during the last years, to 3D document the Early Neolithic site of Portonovo (Ancona, Italy) and, in particular, its latest step consisting in a photogrammetric aerial survey by means of UAV platform. It completes the previous research delivered in the same site by means of terrestrial laser scanning and close range techniques and sets out different options for further reflection in terms of site coverage, resolution and campaign cost. With the support of a topographic network and a unique reference system, the full documentation of the site is managed in order to detail each excavation phase; besides, the final output proves how the 3D digital methodology can be completely integrated with reasonable costs during the excavation and used to interpret the archaeological context. Further contribution of this work is the comparison between several acquisition techniques (i.e. terrestrial and aerial), which could be useful as decision support system for different archaeological scenarios. The main objectives of the comparison are: i) the evaluation of 3D mapping accuracy from different data sources, ii) the definition of a standard pipeline for different archaeological needs and iii) the provision of different level of detail according to the user needs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 38-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna De Groene ◽  
Petar Zidarov ◽  
Nedko Elenski ◽  
Youri Van den Hurk ◽  
Thijs Van Kolfschoten ◽  
...  

The Bulgarian site Džuljunica-Smărdeš, dating to 6205-5529 cal. BC, is one of the oldest Neolithic sites in Europe. Both domestic cattle and caprines are present in the zooarchaeological assemblage, but Sus, in contrast, is extremely rare. It is not known if the earliest Neolithic people in Europe did rear domestic pigs, practised some form of pig management, or only hunted wild boar. This research investigates the human pig relationships, using biometry, kill-off patterns and isotopic dietary analysis. With this integrated methodological approach, it might be possible to characterize human-suid relationships in this pivotal Early Neolithic site with greater accuracy. Understanding this relationship at this site contributes to the broader debate on how Neolithisation and domesticates spread through Europe, and which bio-cultural mechanisms were responsible for differential patterns of animal exploitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document