Unsharp observables and their joint measurement

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1279-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kar
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sixia Yu ◽  
Nai-le Liu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
C. H. Oh

2021 ◽  
Vol MA2021-01 (60) ◽  
pp. 1601-1601
Author(s):  
Rene Welden ◽  
Benno Schneider ◽  
Lars Breuer ◽  
Heiko Iken ◽  
Jürgen Schubert ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (37) ◽  
pp. 375301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pekka Lahti ◽  
Juha-Pekka Pellonpää ◽  
Jussi Schultz

Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Gisin

Twenty-five years after the invention of quantum teleportation, the concept of entanglement gained enormous popularity. This is especially nice to those who remember that entanglement was not even taught at universities until the 1990s. Today, entanglement is often presented as a resource, the resource of quantum information science and technology. However, entanglement is exploited twice in quantum teleportation. Firstly, entanglement is the “quantum teleportation channel”, i.e., entanglement between distant systems. Second, entanglement appears in the eigenvectors of the joint measurement that Alice, the sender, has to perform jointly on the quantum state to be teleported and her half of the “quantum teleportation channel”, i.e., entanglement enabling entirely new kinds of quantum measurements. I emphasize how poorly this second kind of entanglement is understood. In particular, I use quantum networks in which each party connected to several nodes performs a joint measurement to illustrate that the quantumness of such joint measurements remains elusive, escaping today’s available tools to detect and quantify it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1828-1835
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Fen-Zhuo Guo ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Qiao-Yan Wen

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 168382-168394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Strydom ◽  
Ross Crawford ◽  
Jonathan Roberts ◽  
Anjali Jaiprakash
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document