Wage structure in internal labor markets and marginal productivity theory

1983 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon E. Haber
ILR Review ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Segal

This paper describes and evaluates the analytical model of the labor market developed by prominent labor economists of the 1940s and 1950s. The author argues that the post-institutionalist model made significant and lasting contributions to the analysis of labor mobility and the process of job search; to the formulation of models of union policies and the evaluation of the impact of collective bargaining; to the analysis of the factors that shape internal wage structure and contribute to the rise of internal labor markets; and, by its emphasis on the critical role played by the forces of demand, to the analysis of the wage determination process.


2012 ◽  
pp. 125-140
Author(s):  
Heinz D. Kurz

The paper provides a critical assessment of Adolphe Landry's contributions to the theory of capital and interest. His analysis represents one among several variants of marginal productivity theory. The distinguishing feature of his variant is that he considers entrepreneurship a scarce factor of production alongside with the usual factors labour, land and capital. He thus tries to put entrepreneurship - the innovative agens, as Schumpeter saw it - into the Procrustean bed of marginalist theory. It is not clear whether Landry's combination of various ideas to be found in the contemporary literature generates a coherent whole, because his argument is often suggestive and vague and lacks analytical rigour.


1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Pfeffer ◽  
Yinon Cohen

1985 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 431 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Barron ◽  
Mark A. Loewenstein

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-91
Author(s):  
Lee, Jeong-Yeon ◽  
강성춘

2012 ◽  
pp. 97-124
Author(s):  
Anastassios D. Karayiannis ◽  
Ioannis A. Katselidis

The introduction of new technology may have significant effects on the level of employment and the real wage rate; effects that have received considerable attention even from the economic thinkers of the classical period. This paper aims to analyze and evaluate the various views and arguments of early classical and neoclassical economists concerning the technological effects on wages and employment. On the one hand, the economists of the early decades of the 19th century (mainly between 1800 and 1840) had recognized and analyzed many of the effects of technology on labourers' welfare. On the other hand, early neoclassical theorists of the period between 1890 and 1935 tried to expand on the classical views and to develop their own theoretical arguments, based on new perceptions like the marginal productivity theory. The main conclusion drawn is that most of early classical and neoclassical economists recognized and specified the temporary adverse effects of new technology on labour (e.g. short-run unemployment), but, at the same time, they argued for the beneficial long-run consequences of technological progress on labourers' welfare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document