Artificial induction of the apple replant problem byPenicillium claviforme inoculation

1988 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vi Asta Čatská ◽  
V. Vančura ◽  
Z. Přikryl ◽  
Galina Hudská
1982 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlasta Čatská ◽  
V. Vančura ◽  
Galina Hudská ◽  
Z. Přikryl

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-257
Author(s):  
N. C. Sharma ◽  
◽  
Pramod Verma ◽  
Niranjan Singh ◽  
Babita ◽  
...  

1949 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. DE GROOT ◽  
J. J. DUYVENÉ DE WIT
Keyword(s):  

1958 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Mountain ◽  
H. R. Boyce

Peach production in Ontario is largely restricted to the Niagara Peninsula and Essex County, areas that are separated by some 200 miles but have a similar climate. The peach replant problem has been much more serious in Essex County than in the Niagara Peninsula. A survey of mature peach orchards showed that Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Sher & Allen, 1953, is considerably more prevalent in peach soils in Essex County than in the Niagara Peninsula. In both areas, orchards that had a previous history of the replant problem had three to four times greater soil population of P. penetrans than those with no such history. Soils of finer texture were shown to limit the populations of P. penetrans, and the relatively low numbers of this nematode in the Niagara Peninsula appear to result from the influence of the finer soils prevailing in that region. The effect of different soil-particle sizes on the build-up of P. penetrans may explain the distribution of the peach replant problem in Ontario.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document