The relationship between features of residency training and ABIM certifying examination performance

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Norcini ◽  
Louis J. Grosso ◽  
Judy A. Shea ◽  
George D. Webster
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon T. Ferrell ◽  
William E. Tankersley ◽  
Clayton D. Morris

ABSTRACT Background The Psychiatry Resident-In-Training Examination (PRITE) is a standardized examination that measures residents' educational progress during residency training. It also serves as a moderate-to-strong predictor of later performance on the board certification examination. Objective This study evaluated the effectiveness of an accountability program used by a public psychiatric hospital to increase its residents' PRITE scores. Methods A series of consequences and incentives were developed based on levels of PRITE performance. Poor performance resulted in consequences, including additional academic assignments. Higher performance led to residents earning external moonlighting privileges. Standardized PRITE scores for all residents (N = 67) over a 10-year period were collected and analyzed. The PRITE examination consists of 2 subscales—psychiatry and neurology. Change in the overall level of PRITE scores following the implementation of the accountability program was estimated using a discontinuous growth curve model for each subscale. Results Standardized scores on the psychiatry subscale were 51.09 points, approximately 0.50 SD change, which was higher after the accountability program was implemented. Standardized scores on the neurology subscale did not change. Conclusions An accountability program that assigns consequences based on examination performance may be moderately successful in improving scores on the psychiatry subscale scores of the PRITE. This likely has longer-term benefits for residents due to the relationship between PRITE and board certification examination performance.


1957 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen D. Calvin ◽  
F. J. McGuigan ◽  
Maurice W. Sullivan

1982 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Mellsop ◽  
Ellen Berah

A system of in-service assessment of trainee psychiatrists by their supervisors is reported. It has been used for four years in a large, service delivery organisation. Analysis of the data collected indicates that the supervisors' ratings were significantly related to subsequent trainee examination performance. From the individual scores however, it can be postulated that as a feedback aid to learning, its usefulness may have been limited by the narrow range of ratings given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document