The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery

Breast Cancer ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Hiroshi Fukatsu ◽  
Shinji Naganawa ◽  
Hiroko Satake ◽  
Yasuyuki Sato ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Mark Trombetta ◽  
Katherine Kotinsley ◽  
Thomas B. Julian

AbstractThe role of breast conservation in patients expressing BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutations is controversial. A patient who was found to have bilateral synchronous breast cancers and expressed a BRCA genetic mutation was recently evaluated. The patient had a strong desire for breast preservation. This case and a review of the pertinent literature are presented to discuss the role of breast conservation and radiation in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutations.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan White ◽  
Raj Achuthan ◽  
Philip Turton ◽  
Mark Lansdown

Breast conservation surgery is available to the vast majority of women with breast cancer. The combination of neoadjuvant therapies and oncoplastic surgical techniques allows even large tumours to be managed with a breast-conserving approach. The relationship between breast size and the volume of tissue to be excised determines the need for volume displacement or replacement. Such an approach can also be used in the management of carefully selected cases of multifocal or multicentric breast cancer. The role of novel techniques, such as endoscopic breast surgery and radiofrequency ablation, is yet to be precisely defined.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 2250-2255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Adams ◽  
Christine K. Zoon ◽  
Christina Stevenson ◽  
Padma Chitnavis ◽  
Luke Wolfe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12084-e12084
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Kamada ◽  
Kentaro Tamaki ◽  
Kanou Uehara ◽  
Nobumitsu Tamaki

e12084 Background: MRI imaging has become the standard for planning breast conservation surgery for breast cancer. However, due partly to lack of resources of a small clinic practice, we have been utilizing contrast enhanced CT facilitated with ultrasound for this purpose. The aim of this presentation is to assess the feasability of contrast-enhanced CT in breast conservation surgery. Methods: We used GE Brightspeed-8 CT, with HP Z440 workstation (for free line masking). 100 mld of Iopamidol contrast medium was injected at a rate of 3 ml/sec and image capture was done at the 60 or 180 second phase. Images were taken with the patient in a supine position. We evaluate a total of 2057 cases operated in a ten year period between 2005.1.1 to 2014.12.31, excluding cases receiving preoperative chemotherapy. 1,757 cases (85%) were invasive and 300 cases (15%) were non-invasive breast cancer cases. Results: Lesion localization by contrast-enhance CT was acceptable by predefined criteria in 72% of invasive carcinoma cases, and 89% non-invasive carcinoma cases. The breast conservation rate was 77% and 83% for invasive and non-invasive breast cancer cases, respectively. Surgical margins were positive “on ink” for 8 cases (0.6%), and positive within 5 mm (including DCIS) in 340 cases (25.1%) of the 1,357 invasive cancer cases treated with BCT. There were 7 completion total mastectomies and 3 partial mastectomies for the patients with positive margins (11/340 = 3.2%). Surgical margins were positive for 78 cases (31.3%) of the 249 DCIS cases undergoing BCT. There was 1 completion mastectomy and 2 partial mastectomies for the patients with positive margins (3/78 = 3.8%). Local recurrence rates for invasive and non-invasive breast cancer cases undergoing BCT were 2.6% (average observation period 65.0 months) and 2.8% (average observation period 64.4 months), respectively. Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced CT facilitated with ultrasound imaging is an effective and easy to implement modality for planning breast conservation surgery in invasive and non-invasive breast cancer, possibly in part due to imaging that corresponds closely to the breast position during surgery.


1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 862
Author(s):  
Margaret H. Lee ◽  
James R. Maxwell ◽  
Mary Wang ◽  
Lawrence W. Bassett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document