Recursive query answering with non-horn clauses

Author(s):  
Shan Chi ◽  
Lawrence J. Henschen
10.29007/npd4 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopalakrishnan Krishnasamy Sivaprakasam ◽  
Adrienne Raglin ◽  
Douglas Summers-Stay ◽  
Giora Slutzki

In this paper we study Secrecy-Preserving Query Answering problem underthe OpenWorld Assumption (OWA) for Prob-EL>0;=1 Knowledge Bases(KBs). We have designed a tableau procedure to compute a semi model Mover the given KB which eventually is equivalent to a probabilistic modelto KB. Given a secrecy set S, which is a finite set of assertions, wecompute a function E, called an envelope of S, which assigns a set E() ofassertions to each world in the semi modal M. E provides logical protection to the secrecy set S against the reasoning of a querying agent. Once the semi model M and an envelope E are computed, we define the secrecy-preserving semi model ME.Based on the information available in ME, assertional queries with probabilisticoperators can be answered eciently while preserving secrecy. Tothe best of our knowledge, this work is first one studying secrecy-preservingreasoning in description logic augmented with probabilistic operators. Whenthe querying agent asks a query q, the reasoner answers “Yes” if informationabout q is available in ME; otherwise, the reasoner answers “Unknown”. Beingable to answer “Unknown” plays a key role in protecting secrecy underOWA. Since we are not computing all the consequences of the knowledgebase, answers to the queries based on just secrecy-preserving semi modelME could be erroneous. To fix this problem, we further augment our algorithmsby providing recursive query decomposition algorithm to make thequery answering procedure foolproof.1


Author(s):  
Markus Krötzsch

To reason with existential rules (a.k.a. tuple-generating dependencies), one often computes universal models. Among the many such models of different structure and cardinality, the core is arguably the “best”. Especially for finitely satisfiable theories, where the core is the unique smallest universal model, it has advantages in query answering, non-monotonic reasoning, and data exchange. Unfortunately, computing cores is difficult and not supported by most reasoners. We therefore propose ways of computing cores using practically implemented methods from rule reasoning and answer set programming. Our focus is on cases where the standard chase algorithm produces a core. We characterise this desirable situation in general terms that apply to a large class of cores, derive concrete approaches for decidable special cases, and generalise these approaches to non-monotonic extensions of existential rules.


2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-346
Author(s):  
Domenico Cantone ◽  
Marianna Nicolosi-Asmundo ◽  
Daniele Francesco Santamaria

We present a KE-tableau-based implementation of a reasoner for a decidable fragment of (stratified) set theory expressing the description logic 𝒟ℒ〈4LQSR,×〉(D) (𝒟ℒD4,×, for short). Our application solves the main TBox and ABox reasoning problems for 𝒟ℒD4,×. In particular, it solves the consistency and the classification problems for 𝒟ℒD4,×-knowledge bases represented in set-theoretic terms, and a generalization of the Conjunctive Query Answering problem in which conjunctive queries with variables of three sorts are admitted. The reasoner, which extends and improves a previous version, is implemented in C++. It supports 𝒟ℒD4,×-knowledge bases serialized in the OWL/XML format and it admits also rules expressed in SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document