Secrecy-Preserving Reasoning and Query Answering in Probabilistic Description Logic Knowledge Bases

10.29007/npd4 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopalakrishnan Krishnasamy Sivaprakasam ◽  
Adrienne Raglin ◽  
Douglas Summers-Stay ◽  
Giora Slutzki

In this paper we study Secrecy-Preserving Query Answering problem underthe OpenWorld Assumption (OWA) for Prob-EL>0;=1 Knowledge Bases(KBs). We have designed a tableau procedure to compute a semi model Mover the given KB which eventually is equivalent to a probabilistic modelto KB. Given a secrecy set S, which is a finite set of assertions, wecompute a function E, called an envelope of S, which assigns a set E() ofassertions to each world in the semi modal M. E provides logical protection to the secrecy set S against the reasoning of a querying agent. Once the semi model M and an envelope E are computed, we define the secrecy-preserving semi model ME.Based on the information available in ME, assertional queries with probabilisticoperators can be answered eciently while preserving secrecy. Tothe best of our knowledge, this work is first one studying secrecy-preservingreasoning in description logic augmented with probabilistic operators. Whenthe querying agent asks a query q, the reasoner answers “Yes” if informationabout q is available in ME; otherwise, the reasoner answers “Unknown”. Beingable to answer “Unknown” plays a key role in protecting secrecy underOWA. Since we are not computing all the consequences of the knowledgebase, answers to the queries based on just secrecy-preserving semi modelME could be erroneous. To fix this problem, we further augment our algorithmsby providing recursive query decomposition algorithm to make thequery answering procedure foolproof.1

2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-346
Author(s):  
Domenico Cantone ◽  
Marianna Nicolosi-Asmundo ◽  
Daniele Francesco Santamaria

We present a KE-tableau-based implementation of a reasoner for a decidable fragment of (stratified) set theory expressing the description logic 𝒟ℒ〈4LQSR,×〉(D) (𝒟ℒD4,×, for short). Our application solves the main TBox and ABox reasoning problems for 𝒟ℒD4,×. In particular, it solves the consistency and the classification problems for 𝒟ℒD4,×-knowledge bases represented in set-theoretic terms, and a generalization of the Conjunctive Query Answering problem in which conjunctive queries with variables of three sorts are admitted. The reasoner, which extends and improves a previous version, is implemented in C++. It supports 𝒟ℒD4,×-knowledge bases serialized in the OWL/XML format and it admits also rules expressed in SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language).


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 157-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Glimm ◽  
C. Lutz ◽  
I. Horrocks ◽  
U. Sattler

Conjunctive queries play an important role as an expressive query language for Description Logics (DLs). Although modern DLs usually provide for transitive roles, conjunctive query answering over DL knowledge bases is only poorly understood if transitive roles are admitted in the query. In this paper, we consider unions of conjunctive queries over knowledge bases formulated in the prominent DL SHIQ and allow transitive roles in both the query and the knowledge base. We show decidability of query answering in this setting and establish two tight complexity bounds: regarding combined complexity, we prove that there is a deterministic algorithm for query answering that needs time single exponential in the size of the KB and double exponential in the size of the query, which is optimal. Regarding data complexity, we prove containment in co-NP.


10.29007/wm7w ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Klinov ◽  
Bijan Parsia

This paper presents an optimized algorithm for solving the satisfiability problem (PSAT) in the probabilistic description logic P-SROIQ. P-SROIQ and related Nilsson-style probabilistic logics the PSAT problem is typically solved by reduction to linear programming. This straightforward approach does not scale well because the number of variables in linear programs grows exponentially with the number of probabilistic statements. In this paper we demonstrate an algorithm to cope with this problem which is based on column generation. Although column generation approaches to PSAT have been known for the last two decades, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first algorithm which also works for a non-propositional probabilistic logic. We report results of an empirical investigation which show that the algorithm can handle probabilistic knowledge bases of about 1000 probabilistic statements in addition to even larger number of classical SROIQ axioms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 563-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghyn Bienvenu ◽  
Camille Bourgaux ◽  
François Goasdoué

Several inconsistency-tolerant semantics have been introduced for querying inconsistent description logic knowledge bases. The first contribution of this paper is a practical approach for computing the query answers under three well-known such semantics, namely the AR, IAR and brave semantics, in the lightweight description logic DL-LiteR. We show that query answering under the intractable AR semantics can be performed efficiently by using IAR and brave semantics as tractable approximations and encoding the AR entailment problem as a propositional satisfiability (SAT) problem. The second issue tackled in this work is explaining why a tuple is a (non-)answer to a query under these semantics. We define explanations for positive and negative answers under the brave, AR and IAR semantics. We then study the computational properties of explanations in DL-LiteR. For each type of explanation, we analyze the data complexity of recognizing (preferred) explanations and deciding if a given assertion is relevant or necessary. We establish tight connections between intractable explanation problems and variants of SAT, enabling us to generate explanations by exploiting solvers for Boolean satisfaction and optimization problems. Finally, we empirically study the efficiency of our query answering and explanation framework using a benchmark we built upon the well-established LUBM benchmark.


Author(s):  
Víctor Gutiérrez-Basulto ◽  
Jean Christoph Jung ◽  
Leif Sabellek

We introduce the query-by-example (QBE) paradigm for query answering in the presence of ontologies. Intuitively, QBE permits non-expert users to explore the data by providing examples of the information they (do not) want, which the system then generalizes into a query. Formally, we study the following question: given a knowledge base and sets of positive and negative examples, is there a query that returns all positive but none of the negative examples?  We focus on description logic knowledge bases with ontologies formulated in Horn-ALCI and (unions of) conjunctive queries. Our main contributions are characterizations, algorithms and tight complexity bounds for QBE.  


2015 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 315-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghyn Bienvenu ◽  
Magdalena Ortiz ◽  
Mantas Simkus

Conjunctive regular path queries are an expressive extension of the well-known class of conjunctive queries. Such queries have been extensively studied in the (graph) database community, since they support a controlled form of recursion and enable sophisticated path navigation. Somewhat surprisingly, there has been little work aimed at using such queries in the context of description logic (DL) knowledge bases, particularly for the lightweight DLs that are considered best suited for data-intensive applications. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing algorithms and tight complexity bounds for answering two-way conjunctive regular path queries over DL knowledge bases formulated in lightweight DLs of the DL-Lite and EL families. Our results demonstrate that in data complexity, the cost of moving to this richer query language is as low as one could wish for: the problem is NL-complete for DL-Lite and P-complete for EL. The combined complexity of query answering increases from NP- to PSpace-complete, but for two-way regular path queries (without conjunction), we show that query answering is tractable even with respect to combined complexity. Our results reveal two-way conjunctive regular path queries as a promising language for querying data enriched by ontologies formulated in DLs of the DL-Lite and EL families or the corresponding OWL 2 QL and EL profiles.


2013 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 741-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Cuenca Grau ◽  
I. Horrocks ◽  
M. Krötzsch ◽  
C. Kupke ◽  
D. Magka ◽  
...  

Answering conjunctive queries (CQs) over a set of facts extended with existential rules is a prominent problem in knowledge representation and databases. This problem can be solved using the chase algorithm, which extends the given set of facts with fresh facts in order to satisfy the rules. If the chase terminates, then CQs can be evaluated directly in the resulting set of facts. The chase, however, does not terminate necessarily, and checking whether the chase terminates on a given set of rules and facts is undecidable. Numerous acyclicity notions were proposed as sufficient conditions for chase termination. In this paper, we present two new acyclicity notions called model-faithful acyclicity (MFA) and model-summarising acyclicity (MSA). Furthermore, we investigate the landscape of the known acyclicity notions and establish a complete taxonomy of all notions known to us. Finally, we show that MFA and MSA generalise most of these notions. Existential rules are closely related to the Horn fragments of the OWL 2 ontology language; furthermore, several prominent OWL 2 reasoners implement CQ answering by using the chase to materialise all relevant facts. In order to avoid termination problems, many of these systems handle only the OWL 2 RL profile of OWL 2; furthermore, some systems go beyond OWL 2 RL, but without any termination guarantees. In this paper we also investigate whether various acyclicity notions can provide a principled and practical solution to these problems. On the theoretical side, we show that query answering for acyclic ontologies is of lower complexity than for general ontologies. On the practical side, we show that many of the commonly used OWL 2 ontologies are MSA, and that the number of facts obtained by materialisation is not too large. Our results thus suggest that principled development of materialisation-based OWL 2 reasoners is practically feasible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document