Comparison of fracture healing and long-term patient-reported functional outcome between dorsal and volar plating for AO C3-type distal radius fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paphon Sa-ngasoongsong ◽  
Manuela Rohner-Spengler ◽  
Dimitri E. Delagrammaticas ◽  
Reto Hansjörg Babst ◽  
Frank J. P. Beeres
1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Pradhan ◽  
S Lakhey ◽  
BK Pandey ◽  
RR Manandhar ◽  
KP Rijal ◽  
...  

Background: Distal radius fractures are a common injury and without proper treatment leads to high functional impairment and frequent complications. Objective: The aim of this study was to see the functional outcome in patients with comminuted distal radius fractures treated with combined external fixation and open reduction with volar plating. Materials and methods: All comminuted distal radius fractures classified as type C in AO/OTA classification were enrolled for the study from 2005 till 2008. The clinical scoring chart modified by Cooney was used to evaluate the functional outcome. Results: There were twenty-two patients with the average age of 42.18 years (range 19-60) with 15 male and 7 females. The follow-up period was from 14 to 46 months. Accordingly, there were 11 (50%) excellent, 7 (31%) good, 2 (9%) fair and 2 (9%) poor results. There were very few complications in our series. In three patients additional K-wire supplementation was necessary along with external and open internal fixation. Conclusions: Comminuted intra-articular fractures of distal radius should be treated by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation to achieve a high rate of patient satisfaction and satisfactory functional outcome. Key words: distal radius fractures; volar plating; external fixationDOI: 10.3126/kumj.v7i4.2756 Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009) Vol.7, No.4 Issue 28, 369-373


Author(s):  
Anil Kumar Mishra ◽  
Ajay Deep Sud ◽  
Manish Prasad ◽  
Rajiv Kaul ◽  
Chander Mohan Singh

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Distal radius fractures are amongst the most common injuries seen in the emergency department. It is imperative to restore the anatomy as much as possible in order to restore wrist function. Identifying a fracture as ‘unstable’ is critical in predicting the final outcome of treatment. The present study compares two primary modalities of treatment: external fixation and volar plating in terms of the functional outcome post-surgery.  Aim of the study was to compare the functional outcome of fixation of unstable distal radius fractures by external fixation to that of volar plating by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system and analysis of recovery of grip strength and range of motion. Settings and design: Hospital-based; randomized control trial.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 80 patients presenting with unstable distal radius fractures were randomized into two groups of 40 each. One group received external fixation and the second received open reduction with volar plate fixation as the primary intervention. DASH scores were obtained and compared at specified time intervals following surgery.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The results of our study show a better improvement in the mean DASH scores at 3, 6 and 12 months in the volar plating group as compared to the external fixation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Volar plating, with its definitive advantage of direct fracture visualization, has an overall better functional outcome with greater postoperative wrist motion and a lower incidence of complications. </p>


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Boersma ◽  
Erik van de Krol ◽  
Tjarda Tromp ◽  
Maria Nijhuis - van der Sanden ◽  
Michael Edwards

Abstract Background The distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common fracture, with the majority of these fractures being stable. Of all diagnosed fractures, 17% is a DRF, of which a large part is extra-articular and one-third is non-displaced. There is a large variation in treatment advisements for non-reduced DRF. Four to 5 weeks of immobilization is often the usual practice. Existing evidence shows that 1 week of immobilization is safe and does not lead to an increase in secondary displacement. Additionally, shorter immobilization periods may lead to less outpatient clinic visits and less home care for elderly people and may lead to earlier return to work and other social activities. Therefore, shorter immobilization periods for non-reduced distal radius fractures may also prove to be cost-effective. In this study, we aim to successfully implement 1 week of plaster cast immobilization for non-reduced distal radius fractures in twelve medical centers and to evaluate the functional outcome and cost-effectiveness. Methods This study will be performed using a multicenter randomized stepped wedge design in 12 centers. We aim to include in the study 440 patients with an isolated non-reduced DRF between the age of 18 and 85 years old. The patients in the intervention group will be treated with plaster cast immobilization for 1 week. Acceptability of the study protocol, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, complications, pain catastrophizing score, pain and patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness will be measured. The total follow-up will be 12 months. Discussion The strength of this study is the combination of implementing 1 week of plaster cast immobilization for non-reduced DRF and the evaluation of functional outcome, acceptability of the study protocol, and cost-effectiveness in actual practice. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NL9278. Registered on 17 February 2021


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mulrain ◽  
K Joshi ◽  
F Doyle ◽  
A Abdulkarim

Abstract Introduction Distal radius fractures are common and trends for fixation have changed with increased use of volar locking plates in recent time. A meta-analysis will summarise the best evidence for treatment. Method A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology to identify studies that reported clinical and/or radiological outcomes in patients with AO type C distal radius fractures when treated with external fixation versus ORIF. Results 10 randomised trials were included in this review, reporting on 967 patients. Clinical outcomes are in favour of volar plating at 3 months post-operation, but no difference between the two groups is seen at 6 or 12 months. Analysis of complication rates shows a minute increase in risk-ratio for volar plating versus external fixation. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher re-operations after plate fixation and significantly higher infection after external fixation. Conclusions Internal fixation of complex distal radius fractures confers an improved clinical outcome at early follow up only and a minimally increased risk of complications. The improved grip strength with volar plating is only superior at early follow up and no long-term superiority is seen with either intervention. The type of surgery in this injury type therefore remains at the surgeon’s consideration on a case-by-case basis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document