Using mini-arthrotomy for dorsal plating to treat intraarticular distal radius fractures: can it improve radiological and clinical outcomes?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Müller ◽  
Christopher Child ◽  
Florin Allemann ◽  
Hans-Christoph Pape ◽  
Philipe Breiding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Dorsal Plating

scholarly journals Surgical Strategy and Techniques for Low-Profile Dorsal Plating in Treating Dorsally Displaced Unstable Distal Radius Fractures

2016 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 163-169
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Gotani ◽  
Naohito Hibino ◽  
Yoshitaka Tanaka ◽  
Ryousuke Satoh ◽  
Kousuke Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Surgical Strategy ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Dorsal Plating

scholarly journals The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Truong ◽  
Chris Doherty ◽  
Nina Suh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Full Text Screening

Background: Socioeconomic factors are known to affect outcomes for both medical and surgical conditions. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the current evidence regarding the effect of socioeconomic factors such as income, geographic location, educational level, and occupation on clinical outcomes after distal radius fractures. Methods: A systematic search strategy was performed to identify studies commenting on the effect of socioeconomic factors on clinical outcomes following open or closed distal radius fracture repair. Abstract and full-text screening was performed by 2 independent reviewers, and articles were evaluated by Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES). Treatment outcomes of interest included, but were not limited to, pain, function, range of motion, and grip strength. Results: There were 1745 studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria for abstract screening. Of these, 48 studies met our inclusion criteria for full-text screening and 20 studies met our criteria for quality analysis with the SEQES score. There were 3 studies of high quality, 16 of moderate quality, and 1 of low quality. Meta-analyses were not possible due to the variability in outcomes of interest across papers. Conclusions: Patient factors indicative of socioeconomic status are relevant predictors of functional outcome after distal radius fractures. There is currently limited evidence in this area of research, and further examination should be considered to improve outcomes from a patient and system standpoint.

COMPARISON OF RADIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INTERNAL FIXATION USING TWO DIFFERENT VOLAR PLATES FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES

Hand Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul-Hyun Cho ◽  
Si-Wook Lee ◽  
Gu-Hee Jung
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Radial Length ◽  
Type C ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of volar plating using two different implants for distal radius fractures. Fifty-two patients with AO type C fractures were placed in either of two groups: the AO LDRS group (26 patients) or the Acu-Loc group (26 patients). Radiological parameters including radial length, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were significantly improved after surgery. The mean Mayo Wrist Performance Score was 84.6 in the AO LDRS group and 81.1 in the Acu-Loc group. The mean Subjective Wrist Value was 86.7% in the AO LDRS group and 86.3% in the Acu-Loc group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to both radiological and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up evaluation. Volar fixed-angle plating for unstable distal radius fractures had satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. The difference of implant design did not influence overall final outcomes.

R-S1.4 Distal radius fractures: volar vs. dorsal plating

Injury ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. S25-S26 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Machó ◽  
S. Tsitsilonis ◽  
K.-D. Schaser ◽  
N.P. Haas ◽  
F. Wichlas
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Dorsal Plating

scholarly journals Management of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures: Volar or Dorsal Locking Plate—Which Has Fewer Complications?

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe ◽  
Susumu Tokunaga ◽  
Takuro Moriya
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Pathologic Fractures ◽  
Dorsal Plating ◽  
Plate System

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and complications of volar and dorsal plating for the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures, with special regard to indications for dorsal plating. Furthermore, we examine the rationale for choosing dorsal plating and its frequency of use. Methods: Clinical assessments included range of motion measurements at the wrist; grip strength; the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and the Gartland and Werley score. Clinical results were compared with those achieved using a volarly placed locking plate system. According to Lutsky’s plate theory, the rationale for choosing dorsal plating was based on 4 types of pathologic fractures. Results: Of 112 patients, 38 patients were treated with open reduction internal fixation via a dorsal approach and 68 patients were treated using a volar approach. Except for wrist flexion, there were no other statistical differences in the clinical results between groups for both subjective and objective parameters. There were no statistically significant differences in the complication rates between the volar and dorsal plated groups. One serious complication occurred after volar plating. The most common reason for choosing dorsal plating was irreducible dorsal die-punch fractures. Conclusions: The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures with a dorsally versus a volarly placed interlocking plate system demonstrated similar clinical results. Postoperative complications were not readily observed in the patients treated with a dorsal locking plate. Certain fracture patterns are more appropriately stabilized using a dorsal plate fixation.

Comparison of Five Years Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Progressive and Non-Progressive Wrist Osteoarthritis after Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Katayama ◽  
Hiroshi Ono ◽  
Shohei Omokawa
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Locking Plate Fixation

Background: This study aimed to identify the effect of the progression of postoperative wrist osteoarthritis on 5 years clinical and radiological outcomes after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods: Altogether, 56 patients with distal radius fractures were followed up 5 years after surgery. Clinical assessment was performed using the Mayo modified wrist score, a visual analogue scale of pain, the Japanese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, and Patient-related wrist evaluation. Standardized wrist radiographs were used to assess wrist morphology and the Knirk and Jupiter’s degree of osteoarthritis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze postoperative morphological changes in the wrist and carpal alignment regarding their correlation with progression of wrist osteoarthritis. Results: Progression of postoperative wrist osteoarthritis was recognized in 37 of the 56 cases (66.1%). Compared with the clinical outcomes at the time of the fracture union completion, almost clinical outcomes improved up to 5 years follow-up time as well as at 1 year after surgery. The range of wrist flexion at 5 years follow-up was significantly less in the progressive osteoarthritis group than in those with non-progressive osteoarthritis. The persistent step-off immediately after surgery significantly affected the postoperative progression of wrist osteoarthritis. Changes in the radial inclination, volar tilt, and radioscaphoid angle correlated with progression of wrist osteoarthritis. The highest correlation was with the change of radioscaphoid angle. Conclusions: Good clinical results were maintained at 5 years after surgery, but progression of postoperative wrist osteoarthritis interfered with improvement of wrist flexion. Change in the radioscaphoid angle was the factor that was most highly correlated with progression of postoperative wrist osteoarthritis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document