Fostering trust—J Mol Med’s scientific integrity policy

2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Detlev Ganten ◽  
Gregg L. Semenza ◽  
Christiane Nolte
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Integrity

IRB/Scientific Integrity Committee Report

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Mueller ◽  
Richard M. O'Brien
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
Committee Report

scholarly journals Maintaining Scientific Integrity in Publications

1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Fain
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Integrity

scholarly journals American Geophysical Union input on Improving Federal Scientific Integrity Policies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Bergstrom ◽  
Christopher Erdmann ◽  
Matthew Giampoala ◽  
R. Brooks Hanson ◽  
Raj Pandya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
American Geophysical ◽  
American Geophysical Union

The Digi-Table Method as a Tool for Reflecting on Research Ethics

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
Wim Van Der Molen ◽  
◽  
Els Maeckelberghe ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Ethics ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Educational Tool ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Review Committee ◽  
Learning Content ◽  
Ethical Review Committee

"concepts and processes by means of a digitable. It is a tool for familiarizing users with complicated and complex issues, learning content, and addressing the more methodical aspects didactically. In this project, we have adapted the DTM for reflecting on research ethics, i.c. research with human beings and its ethical requirements and the review by the medical ethical review committee (MREC). A MREC reviews research proposals based on various (ethical) requirements and requires researchers to understand the ethical consequences and societal impact of their research. Before writing their own proposals, it is important for students to know and understand these ethical requirements and the process through which research proposals are reviewed. In order to train this, we prepared the digitable to simulate the review of a research protocol by an MREC and adapted it into an existing assignment on research ethics for master students. The students were informed of our aim and the use of DTM as an educational tool, and asked for consent. We invited them to critically assess the activity and we ensured participation would not influence their grade. The students reported a better understanding of the medical ethical review and felt it would improve their own work. From the educator’s perspective, the quality of argumentation of the review was much improved compared to previous years. The DTM as an educational tool is now a standard element in different master courses on scientific integrity. "

Should academic ethics committees be available to review lapses in scientific integrity? No

HEC Forum ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Warren Holleman ◽  
Cynthia Chappell
Keyword(s):  
Ethics Committees ◽  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
Academic Ethics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document