Abstract
It has been traditionally suggested that the early development of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is characterized by a predominant and progressive injury to small nerve fibres followed by large fibre impairment. We alternatively hypothesized that small and large fibre damage due to DSPN in type 1 and type 2 diabetes could develop in parallel and may not only be progressive but also reversible.
Participants from the German Diabetes Study baseline cohort with recent-onset type 1/type 2 diabetes (n = 350/570) and age-matched glucose-tolerant control individuals (Control 1/Control 2: n = 114/190) were assessed by nerve conduction studies (NCS), thermal detection thresholds (TDT), vibration perception threshold (VPT), Neuropathy Symptom Score (NSS), Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) in skin biopsies (type 1/type 2 diabetes: n = 102/226; Control 1/Control 2: n = 109/208). Subsets of participants with type 1/type 2 diabetes were followed for 5 years (n = 184/307; IENFD subset: n = 18/69). DSPN was defined by the Toronto Consensus criteria.
At baseline, DSPN was present in 8.1 and 13.3% of the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups, respectively. The most frequently abnormal tests in the lower limbs below or above the 2.5th and 97.5th centile of the controls were IENFD (13.7%) and individual NCS (up to 9.4%) in type 1 diabetes participants and IENFD (21.8%), malleolar VPT (17.5%), and individual NCS (up to 11.8%) in those with type 2 diabetes, whereas TDT abnormalities did not differ between the control and diabetes groups. After 5 years in type 2 diabetes participants, the highest progression rates from the normal to the abnormal range were found for IENFD (18.8%) by -4.1 ± 2.8 fibres/mm, malleolar VPT (18.6%) by 9.1 ± 20.2 µm, and NDS (15.0%) by 3.7 ± 1.5 points, while vice versa the highest regression rates were observed for NDS (11.2%) by -3.1 ± 1.3 points, sural nerve amplitude (9.1%) by 4.7 ± 3.0 µV, IENFD (8.7%) by 1.4 ± 1.3 fibres/mm, and NSS (8.2%) by -5.8 ± 1.6 points. In type 1 diabetes participants, no major progression was seen after 5 years, but subclinical DSPN regressed in 10.3%.
These findings point to an early parallel damage to both small and large nerve fibres in well-controlled recent-onset type 2 and, to a lesser extent, type 1 diabetes. After 5 years peripheral nerve morphology and function and clinical measures progress to the abnormal range in type 2 diabetes, but initial nerve alterations are also reversible to a meaningful degree.
Patterns of cutaneous nerve fibre loss and regeneration in type 2 diabetes with painful and painless polyneuropathy
