Cytotoxicity of Dental Impression Materials

2002 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.-Y. Chen ◽  
C.-C. Chen ◽  
H.-W. Kuo
2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 2317-2319
Author(s):  
Claudia Florina Andreescu ◽  
Oana Botoaca ◽  
Horia Mihail Barbu ◽  
Doina Lucia Ghergic ◽  
Anamaria Bechir ◽  
...  

There are many steps in fabrication of dental crowns and bridges at which an error can occur, and a technician can only fabricate a quality restoration if the impression itself is of adequate quality. All dental practitioners should have the ability to evaluate the quality of dental impression before sending to the laboratory. Elastomeric silicones (polysiloxane) are the most utilised impression materials in dental practice. The present study deal with the deficiencies of silicones dental impressions sent to commercial dental laboratories for fabrication of single crowns and bridges.


1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Leiggi

Quick setting dental impression materials are nothing new in the paleontology laboratory. In a paleontological note published in the Journal of Paleontology on “The Use of Dental Impression Material For Molding Macrofossils” (Quilty & Williams, 1975), the products Xantopren and Optosil were introduced as a simple and fast method of obtaining precision molds in 1-3 minutes. Since the mid-1970's these products have been replaced by vinyl polysiloxanes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Hwa Kim ◽  
Doug-Youn Lee ◽  
Kwang-Mahn Kim ◽  
Kyoung-Nam Kim

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cicciù ◽  
Luca Fiorillo ◽  
Cesare D’Amico ◽  
Dario Gambino ◽  
Emanuele Mario Amantia ◽  
...  

The advent of new technologies in the field of medicine and dentistry is giving improvements that lead the clinicians to have materials and procedures able to improve patients’ quality of life. In dentistry, the last digital techniques offer a fully digital computerized workflow that does not include the standard multiple traditional phases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate all clinical trials and clinical randomized trials related to the digital or dental impression technique in prosthetic dentistry trying to give the readers global information about advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Data collection was conducted in the main scientific search engines, including articles from the last 10 years, in order to obtain results that do not concern obsolete impression techniques. Elsevier, Pubmed and Embase have been screened as sources for performing the research. The results data demonstrated how the working time appears to be improved with digital workflow, but without a significant result (P = 0.72596). The papers have been selected following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) question, which is related to the progress on dental impression materials and technique. The comparison between dentists or practitioners with respect to classic impression procedures, and students open to new device and digital techniques seem to be the key factor on the final impression technique choice. Surely, digital techniques will end up supplanting the analogical ones altogether, improving the quality of oral rehabilitations, the economics of dental practice and also the perception by our patients.


Author(s):  
S. J. Marrs ◽  
J. C. Thomason ◽  
M. J. Cowling ◽  
T. Hodgkiess

A replica method involving the use of a polyvinylsiloxane impression material with a resin cast, particularly suitable in the study of marine biofilms, is described. The technique has advantages over other methods in that it is quick, non-toxic, non-destructive and inexpensive. Replicas of critical-point dried eggcases of the dogfishScyliorhinus canicula(L.) (Elasmobranchii: Squaliformes) showed the replica to be true down to the size of bacteria. It was also possible to replicate larger areas such as patches of living barnacles on an intertidal rock.The study of marine biofilms often involves the use of destructive techniques such as conventional scanning electron microscopy (SEM), histology andin vacuospectroscopic methods (Baier & Meyer, 1986), so a single surface may not be examined repeatedly. Alternatively, the surface of interest may not be amenable to examination by standard techniques due to, for example, large size or incompatibility of the material of interest. In materials science the use of replica techniques to overcome such problems have been common (Goodhew, 1973), though techniques commonly involve the use of solvents (Loh, 1989) or silicone elastomers that may have a curing period of several hours (Gordon, 1984) and are consequently unsuitable for the study of biofilms. Scott (1982) reviewed the use of dental impression materials for field use in metallurgy and in recent years, dental impression materials have been used in the study of plant morphology (Green & Linstead, 1990). In this paper we consider the use of a hydrophilic polyvinylsiloxane impression material in the study of both microscopic and macroscopic marine biofilms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document