Long-term survival analysis of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1760-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Guo ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Jean Louis Briard ◽  
Xiao-jun Duan ◽  
Fu-you Wang
1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill A. Ritter ◽  
Elaine Campbell ◽  
Philip M. Faris ◽  
E. Michael Keating

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Bachmann ◽  
Lilianna Bolliger ◽  
Thomas Ilchmann ◽  
Martin Clauss

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3247
Author(s):  
Jung-Kwon Bae ◽  
Kang-Il Kim ◽  
Sang-Hak Lee ◽  
Myung-Chul Yoo

While satisfactory results have been reported during short-to mid-term follow-up assessments of hemophilic patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limited literature focusing on long-term survival following TKA exists to date. As part of this investigation, a consecutive series of 78 TKAs in 56 patients with hemophilic arthropathy was reviewed. The mean patient age at the time of operation was 38.7 years old and the mean length of follow up was 10.2 years. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, quality of life, complications, and long-term survivorship of TKA were evaluated. At the latest point of follow up, the average American Knee Society (AKS) knee and function scores had improved from 32.1 to 85.7 points and 41.5 to 83.3 points, respectively. Moreover, the average range of motion (ROM) was significantly increased from 64.2° preoperatively to 84.2° postoperatively. The physical and mental Short Form-36 results were also significantly improved at the latest point of follow up. Postoperative complications appeared in 12 knees (15.4%). The readmission rate in the 30 days after discharge was 6.4%. Revision TKA was performed in three knees for periprosthetic joint infection (n = 2 knees) and tibial component loosening (n = 1 knee). The Kaplan–Meier 10- and 13-year prosthesis survival rates were 97.1% and 93.2%, respectively. The current study suggests that the mid-to long-term results of TKA in patients with hemophilic arthropathy are favorable, with successful long-term prosthesis survival achievable in most cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1524-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. C. Heesterbeek ◽  
A. H. van Houten ◽  
J. S. Klenk ◽  
H. Eijer ◽  
B. Christen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (1) ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas van Ooij ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Harm M. van der Vis ◽  
Daniël Hoornenborg ◽  
Daniël Haverkamp

Aims For many designs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) it remains unclear whether cemented or uncemented fixation provides optimal long-term survival. The main limitation in most studies is a retrospective or non-comparative study design. The same is true for comparative trials looking only at the survival rate as extensive sample sizes are needed to detect true differences in fixation and durability. Studies using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) techniques have shown to be highly predictive in detecting late occurring aseptic loosening at an early stage. To investigate the difference in predicted long-term survival between cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of TKA, we performed a randomized controlled trial using RSA. Methods A total of 105 patients were randomized into three groups (cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing (ACS MB) knee system, implantcast). RSA examinations were performed on the first day after surgery and at scheduled follow-up visits at three months, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after two years follow-up. Patients and follow-up investigators were blinded for the result of randomization. Results RSA secondary stabilization did not show a significant difference between the three types of fixation. A maximum total point motion of less than 0.2 mm in the second postoperative year was shown in each group, which suggests stabilization of the implant. At 24 months after surgery, PROMs significantly improved compared to baseline in all treatment groups. No significant difference was observed between the three groups. Conclusion Secondary stabilization measurements in this study demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In all groups migration stabilized after initial settling of the implant. For this implant the long-term outcome is not expected to be influenced by the type of fixation to the bone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):98–104.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document