scholarly journals Functional weight-bearing mobilization after Achilles tendon rupture enhances early healing response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1807-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kars P. Valkering ◽  
Susanna Aufwerber ◽  
Francesco Ranuccio ◽  
Enricomaria Lunini ◽  
Gunnar Edman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Healing Response ◽  
Early Healing

scholarly journals Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Early Controlled Motion of the Ankle Versus Immobilization

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod ◽  
Emil Graakjær Nielsen ◽  
Beth Hærsted Olsen ◽  
Pablo Gustavo Vinicoff ◽  
Anders Troelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer

Background: Immobilization of the ankle joint has been suggested as a key element in the pathogenesis leading to deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Purpose: To investigate whether early controlled ankle motion (ECM) could reduce the incidence of DVT compared with immobilization (IM) in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 70 years were eligible for inclusion, and treatment was nonoperative. The ECM group performed movements of the ankle 5 times a day from weeks 3 to 8 after rupture. The control group was immobilized for 8 weeks. The outcome measure was DVT diagnosed with color Doppler ultrasound for above- and below-knee DVT at 2 and 8 weeks. The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score, the heel-rise work test, and the Copenhagen Achilles ultrasonographic Length Measurement were performed at 4-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Results: A total of 189 patients were assessed for eligibility from February 2014 to December 2016. Of these, 130 were randomized: 68 patients were allocated to the ECM group and 62 to the IM group. All patients participated in follow-up at 8 weeks assessing for DVT. In total, 62 (47.7%) patients were diagnosed with DVT: 33 of 68 (48.5%) in the ECM group and 28 of 61 (46.8%) in the IM group ( P = .84). DVT did not affect treatment outcomes at 4, 6, and 12 months. D-dimer had low sensitivity (71%) for detecting DVT. Conclusion: We found that 1 in 2 patients presented with DVT in nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. The ECM protocol revealed no benefit versus IM in reducing the incidence of DVT. DVT did not influence functional and patient-reported outcomes the first year after rupture. D-dimer seems an inappropriate test for detection of DVT in patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Registration: NCT02015364 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

scholarly journals Individualized treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture based on the Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA): a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Swennergren Hansen ◽  
Marianne Toft Vestermark ◽  
Per Hölmich ◽  
Morten Tange Kristensen ◽  
Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Individualized Treatment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: An individualized treatment algorithm (Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm - CARTA) based on the ultrasonographic appearance of an acute Achilles tendon rupture has been developed aiming to select the correct patients for operative and non-operative treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate if this individualized treatment algorithm gives a better functional outcome than treating all patients either operatively or non-operatively per default. Methods: This study is conducted as a multicenter three-armed randomized controlled trial. Participants are included from four hospitals in Denmark and randomized 1:1:1 to one of three parallel groups: 1) Intervention group: Participants are treated according to an individualized treatment algorithm, 2) Control group A: Participants are treated non-operative, 3) Control group B: Participants are treated operative. The individualized treatment algorithm for the intervention group is based on an ultrasonographic examination; tendon overlap and elongation below 7% is to be treated non-operative, while no tendon overlap and and/or elongation above 7% will be treated operative. 300 participants will be included over a period of 3 years. The primary outcome is the heel-rise work test at 12 months post-injury. Secondary outcomes are tendon elongation, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the rate of re-ruptures and other complications. The primary analysis will be conducted as intention-to-treat analysis.Discussion: This trial will indicate if treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture can be individualized based on the elongation and tendon overlap. It is hypothesized that different patients will benefit from different treatment instead of offering all the same treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03525964. Registered 16 May 2018.

scholarly journals Individualized treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture based on the Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA): a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Swennergren Hansen ◽  
Marianne Toft Vestermark ◽  
Per Hölmich ◽  
Morten Tange Kristensen ◽  
Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Individualized Treatment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: An individualized treatment algorithm (Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm - CARTA) based on the ultrasonographic appearance of an acute Achilles tendon rupture has been developed aiming to select the correct patients for operative and non-operative treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate if this individualized treatment algorithm gives a better functional outcome than treating all patients either operatively or non-operatively per default. Methods: This study is conducted as a multicenter three-armed randomized controlled trial. Participants are included from four hospitals in Denmark and randomized 1:1:1 to one of three parallel groups: 1) Intervention group: Participants are treated according to an individualized treatment algorithm,2) Control group A: Participants are treated non-operative, 3) Control group B: Participants are treated operative. The individualized treatment algorithm for the intervention group is based on an ultrasonographic examination; tendon overlap and elongation below 7% is to be treated non-operative, while no tendon overlap and and/or elongation above 7% will be treated operative. 300 participants will be included over a period of 3 years. The primary outcome is the heel-rise work test at 12 months post-injury. Secondary outcomes are tendon elongation, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the rate of re-ruptures and other complications. The primary analysis will be conducted as intention-to-treat analysis. Discussion: This trial will indicate if treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture can be individualized based on the elongation and tendon overlap. It is hypothesized that different patients will benefit from different treatment instead of offering all the same treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03525964. Registered 16 May 2018. Keywords: Achilles tendon, Achilles tendon rupture, individualized treatment, ultrasound.

scholarly journals Comparison of Tendon Lengthening with Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab Following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0032
Author(s):  
Kelechi Okoroha ◽  
Najib Ussef ◽  
Erik Eller ◽  
Ferras Zeni ◽  
Vasilios Moutzouros
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Repair Site ◽  
Operative Repair ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Tendon Lengthening ◽  
Tendon Ruptures

Objectives: Operative repair of Achilles tendon ruptures have shown successful outcomes. However, little is know about the amount of tendon or repair site lengthening after repair and if lengthening is affected by rehab protocols. The purpose of our study was to compare lengthening of the Achilles tendon after surgical repair, comparing traditional and accelerated rehab protocols. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing primary repair of Achilles tendon ruptures were assessed for participation. We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial in accordance with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) 2010 statement. The study arms included operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture with either accelerated (graduated weight bearing at 2 weeks) or traditional rehab (weight bearing at 6 weeks). During repair, two 2-mm tantalum beads with laser-etched holes were sutured to the Achilles tendon at the repair site. Beads were evaluated via CT scans immediately post-operatively and at 12 weeks. X-rays were obtained at time 0 and then at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was the difference in tendon or repair site lengthening between the study arms. Randomization was by a computerized algorithm. The observer was blinded and the patient was not blinded to the intervention. Results: Zero patients declined participation and all 20 patients were included for final analysis. All patients showed statistically significant lengthening at two weeks following surgery. There was a trend toward increased lengthening at 6 weeks in the accelerated rehab group (9.9 mm, range 2.6 -13.9 mm) compared to the traditional rehab group (4.1 mm, range 1.5 -9.0 mm), although this was not statistically significant; p = .07. However the final amount of tendon lengthening at 12 weeks after surgery was not different between the accelerated rehab group (14.4 mm, range 11.7 -17.0 mm) and the traditional rehab group (13.4 mm, range 10.7 -17.0 mm); p = .38. Conclusion: This study’s findings suggest that all patients undergoing operative repair of Achilles tendon ruptures have significant lengthening after surgery. Although there was a trend toward increased lengthening at 6 weeks in the accelerated rehab group, there was no difference in tendon lengthening at final follow up between the two groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document