Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1362-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Costa Astur ◽  
Charles Marcon Cachoeira ◽  
Tierri da Silva Vieira ◽  
Pedro Debieux ◽  
Camila Cohen Kaleka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

scholarly journals IS PERCUTANEOUS MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT (MCL) RELAXATION DURING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION A SAFE OPTION FOR GAINING ACCESS TO THE MEDIAL KNEE COMPARTMENT IN CHILDREN?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0004
Author(s):  
John A. Schlechter ◽  
Tanner Harrah ◽  
Bryn Gornick ◽  
Benjamin Sherman
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Medial Collateral Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Introduction: With participation in youth sports anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common occurrence. Nearly 70% of ACL tears in children and adolescents have an associated meniscus tear. Percutaneous medial collateral ligament (MCL) relaxation has been described as utilitarian in accessing the medial meniscus for diagnostic assessment and treatment in the adult population to increase medial compartment working space in arthroscopic surgery. The technique has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of children and adolescents that underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without percutaneous relaxation of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) for meniscal tear management. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients aged 8 to 19 years old that had undergone knee arthroscopy for an (ACLR) with meniscus pathology. Those that underwent MCL relaxation were grouped together and compared to a matched cohort that did not have MCL relaxation performed. Preoperative, operative and postoperative data was analyzed. The primary measurement was obtained using a validated patient reported outcome score (Pedi-IKDC), secondary outcome measures were defined as superficial or deep infection, saphenous nerve dysesthesias, ACL graft failure and return to the operating room. Statistical analysis of the two cohorts was performed. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the study (27 in each group) with average age 15 years (range 10-19). Average follow-up for the MCL relaxation group was 22.4 months versus 58 months for the non-MCL relaxation group. The average Pedi-IKDC score was 93.3 for the MCL relaxation group and 91.4 for the non-MCL relaxation group (p=0.34). There was no difference in patient demographics, return to the operating room (p=0.49), saphenous nerve dysesthesia (p=0.49), superficial or deep infection (p=0.32). Conclusion: ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents with MCL relaxation for the management of medial meniscal tears appears to be a safe option. Equivocal patient reported outcome scores as compared to the control group were found with no increase in post-operative complications. In children with ACL tears, appropriate diagnosis and management of medial meniscal pathology is important to maintain secondary restraint to anterior tibial translation and prevent premature graft failure. Pediatric knees can have tight medial compartments, making access difficult, potentially leading to poor visualization and iatrogenic chondral damage. Percutaneous medial collateral ligament (MCL) relaxation has been described in the adult population to increase medial compartment working space without long term sequela. We report similar findings in an all pediatric cohort.

Strategies for revision surgery after primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2072-2080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Hofbauer ◽  
Bart Muller ◽  
Christopher D. Murawski ◽  
Michael Baraga ◽  
Carola Franziska van Eck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

scholarly journals Predictors of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596711666603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Yabroudi ◽  
Haukur Björnsson ◽  
Andrew D. Lynch ◽  
Bart Muller ◽  
Kristian Samuelsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Frequency With Which Patients Change Surgeons

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711988048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty Sutherland ◽  
Mark Clatworthy ◽  
Kevin Chang ◽  
Richard Rahardja ◽  
Simon W. Young
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Primary Procedure ◽  
Subsequent Revision ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Revision surgery is a known complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), but the proportion of patients who seek a different surgeon for their revision procedure is unknown. Purpose: To determine the rate and risk factors for revision ACLR in New Zealand and to find the proportion of patients undergoing revision ACLR who see a different surgeon compared with their primary procedure as well as the factors that may influence this decision. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data from New Zealand’s single government insurer, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), were analyzed. All primary ACLR procedures performed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014 were evaluated, and revision ACLR procedures performed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016, were evaluated to allow for a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Cases undergoing subsequent revision were divided into those with the same or a different surgeon compared with the primary procedure. Risk factors for revision and change of surgeons were assessed, including age, sex, time from injury to surgery, time between primary and revision procedures, surgeon volume, and ethnicity. Results: A total of 15,212 primary ACLR procedures were recorded in 14,926 patients. The mean patient age was 29.2 years, and 61% were male patients. There were 676 subsequent revision procedures and 510 contralateral procedures during the study period, resulting in a 5-year survival rate of 95.5% for the ACL graft and 96.5% for the contralateral ACL. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex, age <20 years, and <1 year from injury to surgery. Of the revision procedures, 44.5% (n = 301) were performed by a different surgeon compared with primary ACLR. For primary ACLR procedures performed by low-volume surgeons, 75.0% of patients requiring revision ACLR changed surgeons, compared with 21.5% for high-volume surgeons (≤10 vs >50 primary ACLR/y; hazard ratio, 10.70 [95% CI, 6.01-19.05]; P < .001). Other factors associated with change of surgeons included older age, longer time between primary and revision surgery, and Asian and Maori ethnicities. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients change surgeons when requiring revision ACLR. In the absence of formal follow-up systems such as registries, surgeons, particularly those with a low volume of ACLRs, may underestimate their personal revision rate.

Return to sports following arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament in the adult population

The Knee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 906-914
Author(s):  
Harmen D. Vermeijden ◽  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Robert O'Brien ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Return to Play and Long-term Participation in Pivoting Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3339-3346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line Lindanger ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Anders Odd Mølster ◽  
Eirik Solheim ◽  
Eivind Inderhaug
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sports Participation ◽  
Acl Injuries ◽  
Replacement Surgery ◽  
Long Term Consequences ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common and feared injury among athletes because of its potential effect on further sports participation. Reported rates of return to pivoting sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) vary in the literature, and the long-term consequences of returning have rarely been studied. Purpose: To examine the rate and level of return to pivoting sports after ACLR, the duration of sports participation, and long-term consequences of returning to pivoting sports. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All primary ACLRs with a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft between 1987 and 1994 (N = 234) in athletes participating in team handball, basketball, or soccer before injury were selected from a single-center quality database. A long-term evaluation (median, 25 years; range, 22-30 years) was performed using a questionnaire focusing on return to pivoting sports, the duration of sports activity after surgery, later contralateral ACL injuries, revision surgery, and knee replacement surgery. Participants were stratified into 2 groups depending on the time between injury and surgery (early, <24 months; late, ≥24 months). Results: A total of 93% of patients (n = 217) responded to the questionnaire. Although 83% of patients returned to pivoting sports after early ACLR, only 53% returned to preinjury level. Similar return-to-sport rates were observed in males and females ( P > .05), but males had longer sports careers (median, 10 years; range, 1-23 years) than females (median, 4 years; range, 1-25 years; P < .001). The incidence of contralateral ACL injuries was 28% among athletes who returned to sports versus 4% among athletes who did not return ( P = .017) after early ACLR. The pooled reinjury rate after return to preinjury level of sports was 41% (30%, contralateral injuries; 11%, revision surgery). The incidence of contralateral ACL injuries was 32% among females versus 23% among males ( P > .05) and, for revision surgery, was 12% among females versus 7% among males ( P > .05) after returning to sports. Having a late ACLR was associated with an increased risk of knee replacement surgery (9% vs 3%; P = .049) when compared with having an early ACLR. Conclusion: ACLR does not necessarily enable a return to preinjury sports participation. By returning to pivoting sports after ACLR, athletes are also facing a high risk of contralateral ACL injuries. Long-term evaluations in risk assessments after ACLR are important, as a significant number of subsequent ACL injuries occur later than the routine follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document