No dynamic extrusion of the medial meniscus in ultrasound examination in patients with confirmed root tear lesion

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3311-3317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Karpinski ◽  
Theresa Diermeier ◽  
Lukas Willinger ◽  
Andreas B. Imhoff ◽  
Andrea Achtnich ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Karpinski ◽  
Wolf Petersen

Aims and Objectives: Extrusion of the medial meniscus in MRI is an indirect radiological sign for a meniscus root tear. However, a recent study has shown that ultrasound-detectable dynamic extrusion is considered physiological in healthy volunteers. The aim of our study was to analyze the dynamic meniscal extrusion in patients with proven root injury in ultrasound. Our hypothesis was that dynamic extrusion is reduced in patients with root injury of the medial meniscus compared to healthy volunteers. Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria for this prospective study were MRI signs for a root lesion of the medial meniscus (ghost sign, extrusion > 3 mm). An age matched group of healthy volunteers served as control. Exclusion criterion was osteoarthritis > II° of the medial compartment according to Kellgren & Lawrence. The extrusion of the medial meniscus (MME) of the affected knee was measured by ultrasound (US) in supine position and under full weight bearing. Results: 25 patients with a medial root lesion were included in the study. The evaluation of the ultrasound results revealed a significant decreased dynamic medial displacement of the meniscus in patients with root injury. In the supine position, the mean medial meniscus extrusion was 3.60 mm (± 1.00 mm). In the standing position, the mean medial meniscus extrusion increased to 3.72 mm (± 0.96 mm). The mean delta-extrusion was 0.11 mm (± 0.17 mm). This difference was statistically not significant. In 14 patients, no dynamic extrusion was detectable at all. All patients belonging to the medial root tear group had a significant varus deformity (mechanical axis hits the tibial joint line more than 15 mm medially form the center). In the control group, the mean medial meniscus extrusion was 1.34 mm (± 0.37 mm) in supine position and 2.20 mm (± 0.34 mm) under full weight bearing. The mean delta-extrusion was 0.85 mm (± 0.30 mm). The difference in mean delta-extrusion between the root tear and control group was statistically significant. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a diagnostic tool to detect the dynamic extrusion of the medial meniscus. Lack of dynamic extrusion (“dead meniscus sign”) may serve as an indicator for medial root injury.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
PO-JU WU ◽  
TsungYu Lin ◽  
Yung Chang Lu

Abstract Background:Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) can lead to severe knee osteoarthritis predominantly localized to the medial compartment. We aimed to determine whether unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was an effective treatment for primary SONK.Methods:We analyzed the functional outcomes in 23 patients with SONK (with a magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-confirmed diagnosis) who underwent UKA at a single center. The mean follow-up time was 67 months post-UKA.Results:Significant improvements in function were indicated by reduced Oxford Knee and Visual Analogue Scale scores after UKA, and there were no specific complications after the procedures. The incidence of MRI-identified medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) was 69.6% (16/23).Conclusion:Unicompartmental arthroplasty for SONK is less destructive to the native knee structure than total knee arthroplasty, but can achieve comparable prognosis with strict patient selection. While the precise etiology of SONK is unknown, one theory posits that a MMPRT may change the biomechanical circumstances of the knee joint, leading to osteonecrosis. Although not confirmatory, the high prevalence rate suggests that MMPRT may have a key role in the development of SONK. UKA is an effective treatment option for SONK, resulting in significant functional improvement. Long-term (>10 years) outcomes should be investigated.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1606-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byoung-Yoon Hwang ◽  
Sung-Jae Kim ◽  
Sang-Won Lee ◽  
Ha-Eun Lee ◽  
Choon-Key Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document