Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1243-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khanh N. Pham ◽  
Nicole Topp ◽  
Michael L. Guralnick ◽  
Sumana Koduri ◽  
Julianne R. Newcomer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhumy Davé Heliker ◽  
Kimberly Kenton ◽  
Alix Komar ◽  
Margaret G. Mueller ◽  
Christina Lewicky-Gaupp ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 594-595
Author(s):  
Tonya N. Thomas ◽  
Lauren N. Siff ◽  
J. Eric Jelovsek ◽  
Matthew Barber

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Omar Felipe Dueñas-Garcia ◽  
Tania Sierra ◽  
Erica Nicasio ◽  
Katherine Leung ◽  
Cynthia D. Hall ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Hashim ◽  
TR Terry

INTRODUCTION Synthetic midurethral slings are the most common operations performed for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, there is only very scarce evidence regarding the management of complications from these operations. The aim of this survey was to canvass expert opinion regarding the management of recurrent SUI and urinary retention following insertion of these slings. METHODS Expert urologists and urogynaecologists in the UK with an interest in SUI were identified. Three clinical scenarios on recurrent SUI and one on urinary retention following midurethral sling placements were emailed twice to the experts. RESULTS The majority of the experts chose a repeat synthetic midurethral retropubic transvaginal tape (TVT) as the procedure of choice for recurrent SUI in patients who had had a previous TVT or midurethral transobturator tape inserted. In patients who continued to suffer SUI after a failed second TVT, there were mixed results with experts choosing fascial slings, colposuspension and bulking agents as their preferred method of treatment. In women who develop urinary retention following a TVT, tape pull-down within two weeks was the preferred method among the experts. However, division of the tape within two to six weeks following the procedure was also popular. CONCLUSIONS Based on expert opinion, it is difficult to make a recommendation as to the best method of treating recurrent SUI or urinary retention following tape insertion. There is an urgent requirement for well conducted, multicentre, randomised clinical trials to look at the management of these complications and also the tools used to assess the patient before salvage surgical management.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-856
Author(s):  
Célia Amorim-Costa ◽  
Valentina Billone ◽  
Benoît Rabischong ◽  
Nicolas Bourdel ◽  
Gaspare Cucinella ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Nelson ◽  
Spencer Hart ◽  
Eric Kirshenbaum ◽  
Yufan Chen ◽  
Michelle Van Kuiken ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document