Cerebral computed tomographic angiography using third-generation reconstruction algorithm provides improved image quality with lower contrast and radiation dose

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 965-970
Author(s):  
Girish Bathla ◽  
Sarv Priya ◽  
Edgar Samaniego ◽  
Simmi K. Deo ◽  
Nicholas H. Fain ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Rose-Felker ◽  
Joshua D. Robinson ◽  
Carl L. Backer ◽  
Cynthia K. Rigsby ◽  
Osama M. Eltayeb ◽  
...  

Background: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and echocardiography (echo) are used preoperatively in coarctation of the aorta to define arch hypoplasia and great vessel branching. We sought to determine differences in quantitative measurements, as well as surgical utility, between modalities. Methods: Infants (less than six months) with both CTA and echo prior to coarctation repair from 2004 to 2013 were included. Measurements were compared and correlated with surgical approach. Three surgeons reviewed de-identified images to predict approach and characterize utility. Computed tomographic angiography radiation dose was calculated. Results: Thirty-three patients were included. No differences existed in arch measurements between echo and CTA ( z-score: −2.59 vs −2.43; P = .47). No differences between modalities were seen for thoracotomy ( z-score: −2.48 [echo] vs −2.31 [CTA]; P = .48) or sternotomy ( z-score: −3.13 [echo] vs −3.08 [CTA]; P = .84). Computed tomographic angiography delineated great vessel branching pattern in two patients with equivocal echo findings ( P = .60). Surgeons rated CTA as far more useful than echo in understanding arch hypoplasia and great vessel branching in cases where CTA was done to resolve anatomical questions that remain after echo evaluation. Two of three surgeons were more likely to choose the surgical approach taken based on CTA (surgeon A, P = .02; surgeon B, P = .01). Radiation dose averaged 2.5 (1.6) mSv and trended down from 2.9 mSv (1.8 mSv; n = 20) to 1.6 mSv (0.5 mSv; n = 7) ( P = .06) with new technology. Conclusion: Although CTA and echo measurements of the aorta do not differ, CTA better delineates branching and surgeons strongly prefer it for three-dimensional arch anatomy. We recommend CTA for patients with anomalous arch branching patterns, diffuse or complex hypoplasia, or unusual arch morphology not fully elucidated by echo.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Girish Bathla ◽  
Sarv Priya ◽  
Neetu Soni ◽  
Colin Derdeyn

Introduction/Aim: We aimed to determine if CTA imaging using third generation reconstruction algorithm and lower contrast dose-low kVp technique (LD-CTA) was comparable to regular contrast dose CTA at 120 kVp using a sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm (ND-CTA). Methods: Retrospective imaging review of 100 consecutive patients (50 each in LD- and ND-CTA groups). Two readers independently assessed the subjective image quality across multiple vascular segments on a Likert-like scale. Contrast- and signal-to-noise ratios (CNR/ SNR) were compared for the mid-M1-MCA vessels bilaterally and the mid-basilar artery. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare subjective image quality. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the SNR/CNR values. Finally differences in contrast dose, CT-dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Both observers showed excellent correlation in subjective image quality (mean percentage agreement of 95.2% (84-100%) for group-1 versus 89.2% (82%-98%) for group-2). The subjective scores were not statistically different in the anterior circulation but showed significantly better image quality for the basilar artery. LD-CTA group showed significantly better SNR and CNR (p < 0.0001) for both MCA vessels and the basilar artery. ICC showed moderate correlation (0.51-0.63) between the observers. Student paired t-test did not show any significant difference between the observers. LD-CTA group also used lower contrast (49 cc versus 103 cc in ND-CTA) and had lower radiation exposure (DLP/ CTDI for both groups 268.3/12.42 vs 519.5/ 25.15, both < 0.0001). Conclusion: Next-generation reconstruction algorithm and low-Kv scanning significantly improved image quality on cerebral CTA images despite lower contrast dose, and in addition, have lower radiation exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document