scholarly journals The prevalence of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is body position dependent: a retrospective observational study with repeated measures design in an upright MRI scanner

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 979-985
Author(s):  
Luca Papavero ◽  
Stella Ebert ◽  
Carlos J. Marques
2015 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1165-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charalampis Giannadakis ◽  
Lars-Egil Hammersbøen ◽  
Casper Feyling ◽  
Ole Solheim ◽  
Asgeir S. Jakola ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 2011-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charalampis Giannadakis ◽  
Ole Solheim ◽  
Asgeir S. Jakola ◽  
Trond Nordseth ◽  
Agnete M. Gulati ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deng Bo ◽  
Fan Shao Hua ◽  
Feng Xin Bing ◽  
Zhenghua Hong

Abstract Background: To analyze the relational factors influencing the formation of cauda equina redundant nerve roots (RNRs) of the lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods: A retrospective study of 116 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated in our department from January 2016 to June 2019. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to observe the shape and morphology of the redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina.We divided patient into (RNRs) group and non-RNRs( NRNRs) group based on the presence or absence of RNRs on sagittal T2-weighted MR. We analyzed the demographic characteristics, preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores ,preoperative leg pain VAS scores, and preoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) scores, and also analyzed the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. Simultaneously,the inter-vertebral height, intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height +vertebral height, median sagittal diameter at the inter-vertebral space level(DIW-MSD),median sagittal diameter at the pedicel level(DV-MSD),ROM of the stenotic segment, were statistically analyzed for clinical and radiological significance.Results : Of a total 116 total patients,there were no statistically significant differences in either gender [RNRs group (n = 42, 18/24 female) and NRNR group (n = 74, 38/36 female)], age, BMI index, preoperative back pain VAS score , preoperative leg pain VAS score and preoperative ODI score(p> 0.05);however, there were statistically significant differences regard to the duration of symptoms and the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (p<0.05);the inter-vertebral height,Intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, DIW-MSD ,ROM of the stenotic segment were also significantly different between the group (p<0.05).Conclusions:The inter-vertebral height, inter-vertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height + vertebral height, DIW-MSD and ROM of the stenotic segment were the crucial factors related to RNRs in lumbar spinal stenosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Papavero ◽  
Carlos J. Marques ◽  
Jens Lohmann ◽  
Thies Fitting ◽  
Kathrin Schawjinski ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a longer symptom history, more severe stenosis, and worse postoperative outcomes, when redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are evident in the preoperative MRI. The objective was to test the inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification for RNR. Methods This is a retrospective reliability study. A neuroradiologist, an orthopedic surgeon, a neurosurgeon, and three orthopedic surgeons in-training classified RNR on 126 preoperative MRIs of patients with LSS admitted for microsurgical decompression. On sagittal and axial T2-weighted images, the following four categories were classified: allocation (A) of the key stenotic level, shape (S), extension (E), and direction (D) of the RNR. A second read with cases ordered differently was performed 4 weeks later. Fleiss and Cohen’s kappa procedures were used to determine reliability. Results The allocation, shape, extension, and direction (ASED) classification showed moderate to almost perfect inter-rater reliability, with kappa values (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.83, 0.90), 0.62 (0.57, 0.66), 0.56 (0.51, 0.60), and 0.66 (0.63, 0.70) for allocation, shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater reliability was almost perfect, with kappa values of 0.90 (0.88, 0.92), 0.86 (0.84, 0.88), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) for shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater kappa values were similar for junior and senior raters. Kappa values for inter-rater reliability were similar between the first and second reads (p = 0.06) among junior raters and improved among senior raters (p = 0.008). Conclusions The MRI-based classification of RNR showed moderate-to-almost perfect inter-rater and almost perfect intra-rater reliability.


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 1095-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf S. Nerland ◽  
Asgeir S. Jakola ◽  
Charalampis Giannadakis ◽  
Ole Solheim ◽  
Clemens Weber ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
HARUO TSUJI ◽  
TETSUYA TAMAKI ◽  
TATSUO ITOH ◽  
HITOSHI YAMADA ◽  
TAKASHI MOTOE ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnete Gulati ◽  
Tore Solberg ◽  
Charalampis Giannadakis ◽  
Mari Hoff ◽  
Glenn Haugeberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document