Local perforator flaps for soft tissue defects in lower limb trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-312
Author(s):  
Saleigh Adams ◽  
Donald A Hudson
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Limb Trauma ◽  
Lower Limb Trauma ◽  
Tissue Defects

Retrospective Analysis in Lower Limb Reconstruction: Propeller Perforator Flaps versus Free Flaps

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S34-S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Cajozzo ◽  
Alessandro Innocenti ◽  
Massimiliano Tripoli ◽  
Giovanni Zabbia ◽  
Salvatore D'Arpa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Tissue Defects

Background Technical advancements and increasing experience in the management of soft tissue defects in lower extremities have led to the evolution of decisional reconstructive algorithms. Both propeller perforator flaps (PPFs) and free flaps (FFs) proved to be useful methods of reconstruction for lower extremities defects, offering alternative reconstructive tools. We present a case series of PPFs and FFs for reconstruction of lower limbs defects, analyzing and comparing treatment and outcomes. Methods Through a retrospective analysis, we report our experience in performing PPFs or FFs for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the lower extremities, in patients admitted between 2010 and 2015 at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Palermo. In these patients, we evaluated location and causes of defects, types of flaps used, recipient vessels, complications, time to healing, and aesthetic outcome. Results A primary healing rate was obtained in 13 patients for PPF and 16 cases for FF. Revision surgery for partial skin necrosis was required in eight cases (PPF: four and FF: four). Recovery time and hospitalization period were eventually shorter in patients with FFs, due to lower rate of complications and revision surgery. Conclusion In the past years, our indications for reconstruction with PPFs in the lower limb have become more restricted, while we favor reconstruction with FFs. Recommendations are provided to orient surgical treatment in small, medium, and large lower limb defects.

Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Flap in Lower Limb Reconstruction: Is There a Best Option?

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S27-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Corno ◽  
Salvatore D'Arpa ◽  
Pietro Di Summa ◽  
Igor Pellegatta ◽  
Luigi Valdatta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Muscle Flaps ◽  
Limb Reconstruction ◽  
Lower Limb Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Defects

AbstractSoft tissue defects of the lower extremity that expose underlying bones, joints, and tendons pose challenging problems and generally require free tissue transfer for a successful reconstruction. Historically, muscle flaps were the gold standard choice for lower limb reconstruction. To obviate the unpredictable appearance and high donor-site morbidity of muscle flaps, fasciocutaneous flaps were introduced. Recently, perforator flaps, such as the anterolateral thigh flap, gained a leading role in the reconstructive scenario. There is growing evidence in the literature supporting that fasciocutaneous and perforator flaps are comparable to muscle flaps in terms of flap survival, postoperative infection, osteomyelitis, bone union, and ambulation. With the advances of knowledge in perforator anatomy and their mapping, a new era of lower limb reconstruction has begun. Propeller flap could be raised on any suitable perforator vessel and, without the aid of microsurgical anastomosis, used to restore small- to middle-sized soft tissue defects. In this review, we intend to analyze pros and cons of muscle and fasciocutaneous free flaps and the applicability of the propeller flaps in lower limb reconstruction.

Thoracic Propeller Perforator Flaps for Covering Soft Tissue Defects

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matei Ileana ◽  
Alexandru Georgescu ◽  
Radu Lacatus ◽  
Manolis Daskalakis
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Tissue Defects

Preliminary Experience with Perforator Flaps in Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Defects of the Foot and Ankle

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick J. Duffy ◽  
James W. Brodsky ◽  
Christian T. Royer
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Microsurgical Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Defects

Background: Microsurgical reconstruction has improved limb salvage in patients who because of many etiologies have soft-tissue loss from the lower extremities. Free-tissue transfer to the foot and ankle often interferes with postoperative function and footwear because of the bulk of a muscle flap. The foot and ankle often are best treated using thin flaps that will not contract and fibrose, particularly if secondary procedures are required. We hypothesized that perforator flaps, which are thin free-tissue transfers consisting of skin and subcutaneous tissue, both diminish donor site morbidity and are ideally suited for soft-tissue reconstruction of the foot and ankle. Methods: Ten patients had free- tissue transfers to the foot and ankle using perforator flaps during a 2-year period. Four had acute posttraumatic wounds, three had soft tissue defects with exposed hardware or bone graft after reconstructive surgery, and three had large soft-tissue defects after foot infection secondary to diabetes. Nine had reconstruction with anterolateral thigh perforator flaps and one had reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) perforator flap. Results: All flaps survived. There were no deep infections. Three flaps had minor tissue loss requiring subsequent small skin grafts, all of which healed. There were no donor site complications and no interference of muscle function at the donor sites. Custom shoewear was not required to accommodate the flaps. Conclusion: This series highlights the success and utility of perforator flaps in microsurgical reconstruction of the foot and ankle. The greatest advantage of perforator flaps is the diminished donor site morbidity, which was achieved while maintaining high microsurgical success rates. These skin and fat flaps remained pliable and contracted less than muscle flaps, allowing for smooth tendon gliding and easy flap elevation for secondary orthopaedic procedures.

scholarly journals Adipofascial perforator flaps: Its role in reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of lower leg and ankle

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Nanda ◽  
Shamendra Anand Sahu ◽  
Durga Karki ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Amrita Mandal
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Soft Tissue Defect ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Adipofascial Flap ◽  
Tibial Artery ◽  
Split Skin ◽  
Tissue Defects

ABSTRACT Background: Despite advances in surgical skills, adipofascial flaps are still less preferred option for coverage of leg defect. We evaluate the use of perforator-based adipofascial flap in small-to-medium-sized soft-tissue defects in the lower limb. Patients and Methods: After localisation of perforators along the major axial vessels in the lower limb using handheld Doppler, adipofascial flap based on the nearest best perforator of anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery was raised to cover soft-tissue defect in 21 patients. The flap was transposed over the defect and covered by split-skin graft. Donor site was primarily closed. Flap complications, functional and aesthetic outcomes are noted in follow-up. Results: There was partial loss of flap in five patients. After debridement and dressings, split-skin grafting was done for four patients and one patient was managed with local flap. Scar over the flap was stable with no reports of recurrent ulceration or breakdown of wound in 6-month follow-up. Four of five patients reported adequate healing of the fractured bone. Average visual analogue score was 8.24/10 for appearance of donor site as evaluated by the patient. Conclusions: Perforator-based adipofascial flap is a good alternative for coverage of small-to-medium-sized soft-tissue defect of the leg, particularly over the malleolus and lower part of the leg. Use of adipofascial tissue and primary closure of the donor site causes minimal donor-site morbidity. Adipofascial perforator flap provides aesthetically superior recipient-site scar with satisfactory functional outcome.

scholarly journals Free Thoracodorsal Artery Polyfoliate Perforator Flaps for Repairing Multiple Soft Tissue Defects in the Hand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenquan Ding ◽  
Jianbo Xue ◽  
Yingling Zhou ◽  
Lingfeng He ◽  
Xiaofeng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Active Movement ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Perforator Flaps ◽  
Short Operative Time ◽  
Thoracodorsal Artery ◽  
Tissue Defects

Abstract Background: Hand injury is commonly associated with multiple soft tissue defects. Polyfoliate flaps grafting is the optimal approach for multiple wounds.To confirm the feasibility of clinical using of free thoracodorsal artery polyfoliate perforator flaps for repairing multiple soft tissue defects in the hand. Methods: Fifteen patients with hand soft tissue defects that were repaired using free thoracodorsal artery polyfoliate perforator flaps from January 2015 to February 2018 was retrospectively analysed. The survival rate, the operative time, the appearance and sensory recovery of the flaps, and hand function were evaluated. Results: The flaps of all 15 patients survived. Vascular crisis occurred in one patient, and the flap was saved after exploratory operation. The 15 patients were followed up for 12-26 months. Sensation in the flaps was partially recovered in all 15 patients. The wound in the donor area was closed directly with sutures. Obvious scar hyperplasia was noted in three patients. A puffed appearance in the recipient area was noted in four patients.To obtain a more satisfactory appearance, revision of the flap was performed once in these four patients. The Total Active Movement (TAM) evaluation system was used to assess the results, which were considered excellent in seven patients, good in six patients, fair in two patients, and poor in none of the patients. Ten of the 15 patients returned to their primary jobs. Conclusion: Free thoracodorsal artery polyfoliate perforator flaps are appropriate for repairing multiple soft tissue defects in the hand, offer a satisfactory appearance, require a short operative time, and have little impact on the function and aesthetics of the donor site.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document