scholarly journals Efficacy of Short-Term Oral Prednisolone Treatment in the Management of Pericardial Effusion Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Author(s):  
Masahiro Mizumoto ◽  
Naoki Masaki ◽  
Sadahiro Sai

AbstractA standard treatment for pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade after pediatric cardiac surgery has not been established. We evaluated the efficacy of short-term oral prednisolone administration, which is the initial treatment for postoperative pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade at our institution. Between October 2008 and March 2020, 1429 pediatric cardiac surgeries were performed at our institution. 91 patients required postoperative treatment for pericardial effusion. 81 were treated with short-term oral prednisolone. Pericardial effusion was evaluated using serial echocardiography during diastole. Pericardial drainage was performed for patients with circumferential pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of ≥ 10 mm or signs of cardiac tamponade. Short-term oral prednisolone treatment was administered to patients with circumferential pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of < 10 mm or localized pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Patients with localized pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of < 5 mm were observed. Prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) was administered orally for 3 days, added as needed. Short-term oral prednisolone treatment was effective in 71 cases and 90% of patients were regarded as responders. The remaining patients were deemed non-responders who required pericardial drainage. Overall, 55 responders were deemed early responders whose pericardial effusion disappeared within 3 days. There were no cases of deaths, infections, or recurrence of pericardial effusion. The amount of drainage fluid on the day of surgery was higher in the non-responders. In conclusion, short-term oral prednisolone treatment is effective and safe for treating pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade after pediatric cardiac surgery.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Ho ◽  
P H Lee ◽  
T C So ◽  
M C S Chiang ◽  
M H Wong ◽  
...  

Abstract On Behalf Cardiac Team, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Background Management of significant pericardial effusion in cancer patients is controversial. These patients have poor prognosis, and avoiding unnecessary intervention is important. Close monitoring of symptoms and echocardiogram is often a reasonable option, but inherits risk of cardiac tamponade. Whether pericardial drainage by means of percutaneous pericardiocentesis or surgical pericardiotomy could prevent future deterioration or affect survival is unknown. Purpose To evaluate the benefit of elective pericardial drainage in malignancy associated pericardial effusion without echocardiographic or clinical evidence of tamponade effect. Methods From 1st Jul 2014 to 31st Dec 2017, all patients with new onset malignancy-associated pericardial effusion with size more than 1cm were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with clinical or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade were excluded. We compared pericardial drainage versus monitoring for short-term (30-day), mid-term (90-day) and long term (1 year) survival without need for drainage. Results 101 patients were retrospectively analyzed. 40 (39.6%) patients underwent drainage. Overall median survival free from drainage was 4 months. There were no significant difference in short-term (30-day), mid-term (90-day) and long term (1-year) survival free from drainage or mortality between treatment and monitoring group. Size of pericardial effusion did not predict mortality or future need of drainage. Chemotherapy was associated with improved 30-day mortality (RR 0.53 CI 0.32-0.87 p = 0.025) but not survival free from drainage or longer term mortality. Conclusion Close monitoring could be a feasible strategy in cancer patients with significant pericardial effusion without tamponade effect. Baseline characteristics Factor Drainage (n = 40) monitoring (n = 61) p-value method of drainage pericardiocentesis alone 17 NA pericardiotomy alone 13 both 10 Male 19 (47.5%) 27 (44.3%) 0.749 mean size (cm) 1.93 2.77 &lt;0.001 mean age 60.9 63.1 0.357 on chemotherapy 27 (67.5%) 38 (62.3%) 0.593 Abstract 224 Figure. Survival free from drainage


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. e107-e113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Pompilio ◽  
Sara Filippini ◽  
Marco Agrifoglio ◽  
Elisa Merati ◽  
Gianfranco Lauri ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (13) ◽  
pp. 979
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Elias ◽  
Andrew C. Glatz ◽  
Matthew J. O’Connor ◽  
Susan Schachtner ◽  
Chitra Ravishankar ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 852-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheri Yvonne Nottestad ◽  
Alice Marie Mascette

Heart & Lung ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Giordano ◽  
Giuseppe Comentale ◽  
Luigi Di Tommaso ◽  
Ettorino Di Tommaso ◽  
Vito Antonio Mannacio ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. e186-e188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna K. Pasala ◽  
Karthik Gujja ◽  
Hejmadi Prabhu ◽  
Balendu Vasavada ◽  
Sudarsanam Konka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document