Background:
The seasonal trends of idiopathic pericardial effusion (PEff) are not known. Small PEff is usually asymptomatic but moderate to large PEff may lead to cardiac tamponade necessitating pericardial drainage procedures. Seasonal variations of PEff can help identify the association with viral infections that follow a seasonal pattern. Therefore, we sought to characterize the seasonal trends of moderate to large PEff.
Methods:
We retrospectively identified pericardial effusion patients from January 2015 to December 2019. Moderate to large PEff was defined as PEff requiring either pericardiocentesis or pericardial window. Patients with minimal to small PEff, autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis), cardiac surgeries/invasive procedures, hemopericardium, chronic pericarditis, malignancy, and metastasis were excluded. Data was acquired from electronic medical records and frequencies, means, percentages, and chi-square test statistics were calculated.
Results:
Of the 472 patients with PEff, 63% (n=296) were males and 37% (n=176) females. The median age was 61 years. Pericardiocentesis was performed in 65% of patients and 35% had pericardial window. All seasons had similar incidence of PEff (winter 27%, spring 25%, summer 24%, fall 23%, [X
2
=1.81, p=0.612]). The incidence also remained same across all the quarters of the year (Q1 25%, Q2 25%, Q3 26%, Q4 24%, [X2=0.119, p=0.990). The incidence of pericardiocentesis and pericardial window in winter (27% vs 27.5), Spring (22% vs 31%), summer (26% vs 20%), fall (25% vs 20%) showed no difference (X2=6.40, p=0.094).
Conclusion:
The incidence of moderate to large acute idiopathic pericardial effusion is consistent across all seasons and quarters. Similarly, no significant seasonality was associated with pericardiocentesis and pericardial window procedures.