Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of soft-tissue masses in the pediatric population

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1173-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence Metz ◽  
Amer Heider ◽  
Ranjith Vellody ◽  
Marcus D. Jarboe ◽  
Joseph J. Gemmete ◽  
...  
Sarcoma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brock Walker ◽  
Erin Stockwell ◽  
Kellen Worhacz ◽  
Paul Kang ◽  
Amalia Decomas

Background. Percutaneous needle biopsy has been found to be a safe and accurate method for the initial investigation of soft tissue masses. The notion exists that needle biopsies should be performed in specialized sarcoma centers, which can place a financial burden on patients without a sarcoma center near their place of residence. There is no consensus in the current literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of clinic-based percutaneous core needle biopsy performed by community orthopedic surgeons with fellowship training in musculoskeletal oncology. Questions/Purposes. Our primary goal was to determine if office-based core needle biopsy of soft tissue masses could safely yield accurate diagnoses when performed by a community orthopedic surgeon with fellowship training in musculoskeletal oncology. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 105 patients who underwent percutaneous core needle biopsy of soft tissue masses in a community clinic. All procedures were performed by one fellowship-trained musculoskeletal oncologist. Accuracy of the initial clinic-based needle biopsy was determined through comparison to the results of pathological analysis of the surgically excised masses. Final data analysis included 69 patients who underwent both clinic-based biopsy and subsequent surgical excision of their masses. Results. We found clinic-based biopsies to be 87.0% accurate for exact diagnosis and 94.2% accurate in determining whether the mass was benign or malignant (p<0.0001). Minor complications related to the clinic-based biopsy occurred in 5.80% of cases, with no documentation of major complications. Conclusions. Our results provide evidence that office-based percutaneous biopsy can be administered safely and yield accurate, clinically useful results when performed by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal oncologist.


2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Mitton ◽  
Leanne L. Seeger ◽  
Mark A. Eckardt ◽  
Kambiz Motamedi ◽  
Fritz C. Eilber ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (14) ◽  
pp. 2021-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ray-Coquard ◽  
D. Ranchère-Vince ◽  
P. Thiesse ◽  
H. Ghesquières ◽  
P. Biron ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 2598-2606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianwen Qi ◽  
Ming Zhao ◽  
Tongyu Hu ◽  
Guochuan Zhang

Objective This retrospective study was performed to investigate the diagnostic yield of percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) for suspected soft tissue lesions of the extremities. Methods The medical records of 139 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous CNB for suspected soft tissue lesions of the extremities from January 2014 to December 2016 at a single institution were reviewed. The pathologic findings or clinical follow-ups were used to evaluate the performance of CNB. Alterations in the treatment regimen from pre- to post-biopsy were also analyzed. Complications, when present, were documented. Results In total, 141 biopsy procedures were performed in 139 patients. In total, 136 (96%) biopsies were successful, among which 5 were false-negative and 131 were diagnosed accurately. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CNB in the differentiation of malignant from benign lesions were 94%, 100%, 96%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. The treatment regimen was altered based on the biopsy findings in 25 cases. Two patients developed mild nerve injury but fully recovered during follow-up. Conclusions CNB is effective and safe, with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions, especially for differentiating malignant from benign lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document