Visualization of joint and bone using dual-energy CT arthrography with contrast subtraction: in vitro feasibility study using porcine joints

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 673-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jee Won Chai ◽  
Jung-Ah Choi ◽  
Ja-Young Choi ◽  
Sujin Kim ◽  
Sung Hwan Hong ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rashpal Sandhu ◽  
Mercan Aslan ◽  
Nancy Obuchowski ◽  
Andrew Primak ◽  
Wadih Karim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 392-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances E. Walstra ◽  
Jonathan Hickle ◽  
Peter Duggan ◽  
Rashid Alsharhan ◽  
Nicolas Murray ◽  
...  

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has the potential to detect musculoskeletal pathology with greater sensitivity than conventional CT alone at no additional radiation dose to the patient. It therefore has the potential to reduce the need for further diagnostic imaging or procedures (e.g., joint aspirations in the case of gout or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm undisplaced fractures).DECT is a well-established technique for the detection of gout arthropathy. Multiple newer applications have shown clinical potential including bone marrow edema detection and metal artifact reduction. Collagen analysis, bone marrow lesion detection, and iodine mapping in CT arthrography are areas of possible future application and development.This article outlines 10 tips on the use of DECT imaging of the musculoskeletal system, explaining the technique and indications with practical suggestions to help guide the radiologist.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1553-1559 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thomas ◽  
O. Patschan ◽  
D. Ketelsen ◽  
I. Tsiflikas ◽  
A. Reimann ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Diekhoff ◽  
Michael Scheel ◽  
Sandra Hermann ◽  
Jürgen Mews ◽  
Bernd Hamm ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 256 (2) ◽  
pp. 617-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Pache ◽  
Bernhard Krauss ◽  
Peter Strohm ◽  
Ulrich Saueressig ◽  
Philipp Blanke ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
M.J. Bader ◽  
N. Haseke ◽  
T.R.C. Johnson ◽  
A. Graser ◽  
M. Staehler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
Gregory Michalak ◽  
Ramanathan Kadirvel ◽  
Daying Dai ◽  
Michael Gilvarry ◽  
...  

Background and purpose Because computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging modality for the evaluation of acute ischemic stroke patients, developing CT-based techniques for improving clot characterization could prove useful. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to determine which single-energy or dual-energy CT techniques provided optimum discrimination between red blood cell (RBC) and fibrin-rich clots. Materials and methods Seven clot types with varying fibrin and RBC densities were made (90% RBC, 99% RBC, 63% RBC, 36% RBC, 18% RBC and 0% RBC with high and low fibrin density) and their composition was verified histologically. Ten of each clot type were created and scanned with a second generation dual source scanner using three single (80 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV) and two dual-energy protocols (80/Sn 140 kV and 100/Sn 140 kV). A region of interest (ROI) was placed over each clot and mean attenuation was measured. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated at each energy level to determine the accuracy at differentiating RBC-rich clots from fibrin-rich clots. Results Clot attenuation increased with RBC content at all energy levels. Single-energy at 80 kV and 120 kV and dual-energy 80/Sn 140 kV protocols allowed for distinguishing between all clot types, with the exception of 36% RBC and 18% RBC. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 80/Sn 140 kV dual-energy protocol had the highest area under the curve for distinguishing between fibrin-rich and RBC-rich clots (area under the curve 0.99). Conclusions Dual-energy CT with 80/Sn 140 kV had the highest accuracy for differentiating RBC-rich and fibrin-rich in-vitro thrombi. Further studies are needed to study the utility of non-contrast dual-energy CT in thrombus characterization in acute ischemic stroke.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2110-2116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven F. Thieme ◽  
Winfried Möller ◽  
Sven Becker ◽  
Uwe Schuschnig ◽  
Oliver Eickelberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document